2015
DOI: 10.1016/s1001-6058(15)60452-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent progress in CFD for naval architecture and ocean engineering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prediction of resistance is the oldest application of CFD in ship hydrodynamics and its accuracy has improved significantly. Simulations show an average error of 3.3%  (displacement) for resistance in both high and low Fr (Froude number) scenarios in recent studies [3]. The use of CFD tools is now readily available and puts prediction of resistance and seakeeping within reach for most users.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Prediction of resistance is the oldest application of CFD in ship hydrodynamics and its accuracy has improved significantly. Simulations show an average error of 3.3%  (displacement) for resistance in both high and low Fr (Froude number) scenarios in recent studies [3]. The use of CFD tools is now readily available and puts prediction of resistance and seakeeping within reach for most users.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…catamaran [9] and trimarans [10]. It is possible to say that, accuracy of RANSE approaches on the estimation of resistance components is significantly improved over the last decades [11], on the other hand, there may be some problems to predict the wave profiles on the ship hull [12] and wave deformation in the far field [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plenty of authors have published their papers in dealing with the determination of forces and moments (Vaz et al, 2010), the influence by using different turbulence closure models (Phillips et al, 2010;Sakthivel et al, 2011), the verification and validation of the results (Simonsen et al, 2003;Zhang, 2010), the comparison of dynamic characteristics of different geometries and configurations , and even the real simulation coupled with motions via overlapping grid techniques (Carrica et al, 2012) as well as the optimization process (Rajabi and Kavianpour, 2014). As recently reviewed by Stern et al (2013) and Stern et al (2014), CFD capabilities continue to advance at even faster speed, and are changing the face of shipbuilding industry by transforming the build-and-test design spiral approach to the simulation-based design (SBD) approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%