2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2004.02.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent progress in biocatalyst discovery and optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
30
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Automation of the screening is particularly welcome as screening "hits" are typically low (less than two out of a total of 10,000 clones have industrially relevant enzymes) (Lorenz and Eck 2005). However, the screening hit rate can be improved by: (1) the use of different expression hosts, (2) the use of diverse strategies to enrich/select for community genomes with desired traits before metagenomic library construction, (3) the use of liquid enrichment cultures for the screening of multiple clones simultaneously, and (4) the development of novel high-throughput screening strategies compatible with fluorescence-activated cell sorting of the clones (throughput of 10 9 events per day) (Robertson and Steer 2004). In the sequence-driven analysis, clones of interest are identified based on the presence of conserved regions in phylogenetic marker genes (e.g., 16S rRNA genes) or in functional genes coding for key processes, such as oxygenases (Erwin et al 2005).…”
Section: Metagenomicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Automation of the screening is particularly welcome as screening "hits" are typically low (less than two out of a total of 10,000 clones have industrially relevant enzymes) (Lorenz and Eck 2005). However, the screening hit rate can be improved by: (1) the use of different expression hosts, (2) the use of diverse strategies to enrich/select for community genomes with desired traits before metagenomic library construction, (3) the use of liquid enrichment cultures for the screening of multiple clones simultaneously, and (4) the development of novel high-throughput screening strategies compatible with fluorescence-activated cell sorting of the clones (throughput of 10 9 events per day) (Robertson and Steer 2004). In the sequence-driven analysis, clones of interest are identified based on the presence of conserved regions in phylogenetic marker genes (e.g., 16S rRNA genes) or in functional genes coding for key processes, such as oxygenases (Erwin et al 2005).…”
Section: Metagenomicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applying these techniques and also rational protein design, the improvement of biocatalysts' activity, selectivity and stability are aimed (Bornscheuer and Pohl, 2001;Petrounia and Arnold, 2000;Polizzi et al, 2007;Robertson and Steer, 2004). To tap the full potential of these techniques, it is essential to combine them with adequate screening methods (Jaeger and Eggert, 2004;Reetz and Jaeger, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to chemical catalysts, enzymes have two key advantages. One is their high selectivity; the other is their great diversity in nature [10]. Whole-cell biocatalysis combines these benefits with simple, low-cost catalyst preparation and the possibility to develop efficient processes for cofactor regeneration and multistep conversions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%