2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2023.107834
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent progress in anti-icing and deicing applications of the photothermal conversion materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 139 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is worth mentioning that, for the cases when the temperature is above 11 • C, the soft layer may have adverse effects on the ice adhesion strength; this can be explained from the reactive bubbles that create a thermal insulation layer that actually keep the ice from the heat generated from the thermal activation resistor, as previously seen in Figure 10. A comparison of the adhesion-breaking strength with other published methods, such as surfaces modified with SiC carbon nanotubes [22], oil-impregnated polyurethane [23], UV-modified PDMS [24], and novel porous photothermal material [8], has also been made, as seen in Figure 12b. The proposed soft layers exhibit low adhesion strength in this category.…”
Section: Bond-breaking Force and Stressmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it is worth mentioning that, for the cases when the temperature is above 11 • C, the soft layer may have adverse effects on the ice adhesion strength; this can be explained from the reactive bubbles that create a thermal insulation layer that actually keep the ice from the heat generated from the thermal activation resistor, as previously seen in Figure 10. A comparison of the adhesion-breaking strength with other published methods, such as surfaces modified with SiC carbon nanotubes [22], oil-impregnated polyurethane [23], UV-modified PDMS [24], and novel porous photothermal material [8], has also been made, as seen in Figure 12b. The proposed soft layers exhibit low adhesion strength in this category.…”
Section: Bond-breaking Force and Stressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measured interface-breaking strength. Note: the error bars in (a) indicate combined sensor uncertainty, which is calculated based on RSS uncertainty, taking all of the input and sensors into account, assuming the tip is 90% in contact with the ice, and the results in (b) compare the adhesion breaking strength values among the reported work (SiC-CNT[22], OIP[23], UV PDMS[24], and porous photothermal material[8]) and the one in this work.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surficial ice on the equipment can cause serious damage or increase maintenance costs, so many strategies have been developed to inhibit the ice growth or remove the ice on the equipment surface. , Given the outstanding interfacial photothermal property and high hydrophobicity of SFMMM, the photothermal de-icing performance was carried out (Figure A). The cotton membrane exhibits a superior hydrophilicity with complete infiltration in 0.1 s, while the SFMMM keeps remarkable hydrophobicity with a WCA of 125° even after 10 min (Figure B).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%