2014
DOI: 10.1007/s13213-014-0932-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent literature review of soil processing methods for recovery of Bacillus anthracis spores

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…; Silvestri et al . ). Isolation of bacillary spores from sand and sandy soil is mostly more effective compared to other soil types (Agarwal et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…; Silvestri et al . ). Isolation of bacillary spores from sand and sandy soil is mostly more effective compared to other soil types (Agarwal et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In soil samples, direct processing is complicated by the presence of other spore‐forming bacterial species and by soil compounds, such as humic acids, which are known to be PCR inhibitors (Silvestri et al . ). Although the use of the direct method can yield good quality DNA, the total amount of isolated DNA can be quite low using this technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With the advent of more rapid and less expensive wholegenome sequencing approaches, discrimination between closely related species and strains is readily attainable (16,17). Nevertheless, chemical constituents of soil (such as organics, humic acids, and/or heavy metals) often interfere with nucleic acid-based chemistry and make direct detection of B. anthracis extremely difficult (18)(19)(20)(21). Consequently, the majority of detection assays incorporate sample processing methods to separate, concentrate, and purify B. anthracis spores from soil prior to DNA extraction (21).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, chemical constituents of soil (such as organics, humic acids, and/or heavy metals) often interfere with nucleic acid-based chemistry and make direct detection of B. anthracis extremely difficult (18)(19)(20)(21). Consequently, the majority of detection assays incorporate sample processing methods to separate, concentrate, and purify B. anthracis spores from soil prior to DNA extraction (21). Further complications arise during clearance monitoring as small numbers of viable spores must be recognized amid a landscape of nonviable spores.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%