2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.07.724
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent investigations into pig antigen and anti-pig antibody expression

Abstract: Genetic engineering of donor pigs to eliminate expression of the dominant xenogeneic antigen galactose α1,3 galactose (Gal) has created a sea change in the immunobiology of xenograft rejection. Antibody mediated xenograft rejection of GGTA-1 α-galactosyltransferase (GTKO) deficient organs is now directed to a combination of non-Gal pig protein and carbohydrate antigens. Glycan analysis of GTKO tissues identified no new neo-antigens but detected high levels of N-acetylneuraminic acid (Neu5Gc) modified glycoprot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
38
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gal is not expressed in humans or Old World NHPs but is expressed at high levels in porcine tissues. Genetically modified pigs, with a mutation in the GGTA‐1 locus (GTKO), do not express the Gal antigen . The introduction of GTKO donor organs eliminated anti‐Gal‐mediated xenograft rejection, but did not eliminate antibody‐mediated rejection and instead highlighted the importance of antibody directed to non‐Gal pig antigens …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gal is not expressed in humans or Old World NHPs but is expressed at high levels in porcine tissues. Genetically modified pigs, with a mutation in the GGTA‐1 locus (GTKO), do not express the Gal antigen . The introduction of GTKO donor organs eliminated anti‐Gal‐mediated xenograft rejection, but did not eliminate antibody‐mediated rejection and instead highlighted the importance of antibody directed to non‐Gal pig antigens …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other genetic modifications of source pigs with potential beneficial effects include the removal of the additional 2 known xenoantigens, (I) N-glycolylneuraminc acid, ie, knockout of the cytidine monophosphate-N-acetylneuraminic acid hydroxylase gene CMAH 61 and (ii) the Sd(a) antigen, ie, knockout of the β1,4N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase gene (β 4GALNT2 ) 62 (reviewed in 63 ). Human antibody binding to pig cells not expressing these 3 antigens is greatly reduced.…”
Section: Other Potential Genetic Modifications Of Islet-source Pigsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other genetic modifications of donor pigs with putative beneficial effects on the outcome of islet xenotransplantation include the removal of additional xenoantigens, such as Neu5Gc (knockout of the cytidine monophosphate-Nacetylneuraminic acid hydroxylase gene CMAH) and Sd(a), (knockout of the beta-1, 4-N-acetyl-galactosaminyl transferase 2 gene B4GALNT2) (reviewed in [76]). Preliminary in vitro studies indicated that elimination of Neu5Gc in addition to αGal may reduce early pig islet loss from IBMIR [77].…”
Section: Genetic Modification Of Islets Donor Pigsmentioning
confidence: 99%