1983
DOI: 10.1109/tim.1983.4315005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent Improvements to the UK National Microwave Attenuation Standards

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The linearity is established from VNA measurements, made by the client, of a step attenuator. These measurements are compared with calibrated values derived beforehand by NPL using primary national standard attenuation measurement facilities [16]. The step attenuator is sent from NPL to the client laboratory so that the VNA measurements are made by the client in their own laboratory.…”
Section: Uncertainty Of Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The linearity is established from VNA measurements, made by the client, of a step attenuator. These measurements are compared with calibrated values derived beforehand by NPL using primary national standard attenuation measurement facilities [16]. The step attenuator is sent from NPL to the client laboratory so that the VNA measurements are made by the client in their own laboratory.…”
Section: Uncertainty Of Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [8], the leakage between the MIMO antenna elements can be reduced by increasing the isolation between antennas. In [9][10][11], the leakage in RF attenuation measurements can be minimised using voltage ratio system and super-heterodyne system. In [13][14][15], the leakage in RF attenuation measurements using inductive voltage divider (IVD) is demonstrated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By using RF tuners and isolation elements, a precise match of source and load to the line impedance is possible. It provides smallest mismatch uncertainty if carefully executed, but has to be carried out anew when changing the measurement frequency [1] [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%