2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-11931-6_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent Improvements of MagicHaskeller

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We applied our algorithm to MagicHaskeller [13], our systematic exhaustive search library for Haskell. {f1, f2}, {f1, f2, g1}, {f1, f2, g1, h1, h2}, ...], where f1 and f2 are obtained from the first search, g1 is obtained from the first deepening, and h1 and h2 are obtained from the second deepening.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We applied our algorithm to MagicHaskeller [13], our systematic exhaustive search library for Haskell. {f1, f2}, {f1, f2, g1}, {f1, f2, g1, h1, h2}, ...], where f1 and f2 are obtained from the first search, g1 is obtained from the first deepening, and h1 and h2 are obtained from the second deepening.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two main approaches (and combinations thereof): generate-and-test IP, which systematically produces many candidate function definitions and uses the I/O pairs to filter them, and analytical IP, which pursues synthesis directly using strategies modelled upon human programming, like detection of regularities in the I/O pairs. A recent representative of the generate-andtest approach is MagicHaskeller [Katayama 2007[Katayama , 2010, and of the analytical approach, is Igor-II [Kitzelmann and Schmid 2006;Kitzelmann 2007;Hofmann 2010]. Both systems generate functional (Haskell) programs.…”
Section: Inductive Program Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for non-GP systems, an approach using delayed-acceptance hillclimbing for inductive synthesis proved competitive with GP on PSB1, including producing the only known solutions to the Collatz Numbers problem [44]. A comparison was made between Flash Fill [11], MagicHaskeller [26], PushGP, and G3P, finding that the non-GP methods fared much worse but ran much faster than the GP methods [41]. Finally, Monte Carlo tree search was used to generate Java bytecode programs using a few of the problems in PSB1 [31].…”
Section: Past Research Using Psb1mentioning
confidence: 99%