2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2007.12.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent Developments in the Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz Procedure for Multireader ROC Study Analysis

Abstract: Rationale and Objectives-The Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz (DBM) method has been one of the most popular methods for analyzing multireader receiver operating characteristic (ROC) studies since it was proposed in 1992. Despite its popularity, the original procedure has several drawbacks: it is limited to jackknife accuracy estimates, it is substantially conservative, and it is not based on a satisfactory conceptual or theoretical model. Recently, solutions to these problems have been presented in three papers. Our purpo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
120
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 175 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
120
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used McNemar's test to compare the sensitivity and specificity of the iPad 2 and the LCD monitor [20]. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for the displaying devices were compared by the Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz method, using RSCORE and semi-parametric estimation of ROC indices with DBM-MRMC software (version 2.3, available from http://perception.radiology.uiowa.edu) [21]. In assessing the differences between overall reviewer's performances, the areas under the ROC curves were calculated by the above same method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used McNemar's test to compare the sensitivity and specificity of the iPad 2 and the LCD monitor [20]. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for the displaying devices were compared by the Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz method, using RSCORE and semi-parametric estimation of ROC indices with DBM-MRMC software (version 2.3, available from http://perception.radiology.uiowa.edu) [21]. In assessing the differences between overall reviewer's performances, the areas under the ROC curves were calculated by the above same method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selection of an image location, if a nodule was present in the image, was considered a true positive image identification. To compare the detection performance of the radiologists, a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis based on the multiple reader multiple case (MRMC) method developed by Dorfman, Berbaum, and Metz and implemented in the software DBM MRMC 2.2 was used [16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. The analysis considered readers as fixed effects and the cases as random effects.…”
Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…devchakraborty.com). The algorithm used for significance testing, applicable to all FOMs in this study and implemented as a subroutine in JAFROC software, was developed at the University of Iowa (45)(46)(47). JAFROC software was appropriately modified to allow this algorithm to be used with nonarea-based FOMs, such as maximum LLF and others.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statistical analysis for the case management question involved the use of standard multiple reader and multiple case analysis by using the Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz procedure (45) as updated by Hillis et al (46,47) at an a level of .05. The levels of significance of reader and modality-reader effects were calculated by using the analysis of variance table output of JAFROC.…”
Section: Thoracic Imaging: Multi-institutional Evaluation Of Pulmonarmentioning
confidence: 99%