2015
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2777430
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent Developments in Intellectual Property Law in Uganda

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We recommend that the Ministry of Health in Uganda should coordinate this collaboration. Bakibinga (61) reported that contemporary Intellectual Property Law permits only the patenting of an identified "active principle" from a plant, and not the plant or folk information relating to medicinal properties of a plant, according to Copyright and Intellectual Property Rights (CIPR). Therefore, we recommend that the issues of traditional medicine practitioners should be fully exploited with the help of Gulu University and the Registrar of Patents office in Uganda.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We recommend that the Ministry of Health in Uganda should coordinate this collaboration. Bakibinga (61) reported that contemporary Intellectual Property Law permits only the patenting of an identified "active principle" from a plant, and not the plant or folk information relating to medicinal properties of a plant, according to Copyright and Intellectual Property Rights (CIPR). Therefore, we recommend that the issues of traditional medicine practitioners should be fully exploited with the help of Gulu University and the Registrar of Patents office in Uganda.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%