The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1996
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/41/3/001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent developments in breast imaging

Abstract: A review of breast imaging has already appeared in 1982 in this journal. Consequently, the present article concentrates on a discussion of only those developments of a more recent nature. Although the emphasis is placed on the physical aspects of the different imaging methods concerned, the essential factors relating to the clinical background and the associated radiation risk are also outlined. The completeness of detail depends on the present clinical importance of the method under discussion. X-ray mammogra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
71
0
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 286 publications
1
71
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonmammographic breast-imaging techniques other than ultrasound and MRI have been studied, and several reviews of such alternative technologies are available [5]- [7]. Although extensively studied, passive microwave radiometry (thermography) [8] was not considered promising in two of these reviews [5], [6].…”
Section: Background Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonmammographic breast-imaging techniques other than ultrasound and MRI have been studied, and several reviews of such alternative technologies are available [5]- [7]. Although extensively studied, passive microwave radiometry (thermography) [8] was not considered promising in two of these reviews [5], [6].…”
Section: Background Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3]. The most common imaging method at this moment, X-ray mammography, is not very sensitive to differences between normal fibrotic tissue and cancer, making it less suitable for imaging young dense breasts which usually are fibrotic [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The association of X-ray mammography with uncomfortable or painful breast compression and exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation may reduce patient compliance with screening recommendations. These concerns motivate the search for techniques that image other physical tissue properties or metabolic changes [5], [6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%