1994
DOI: 10.1016/0029-8018(94)90002-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent developments in “added-mass” planing theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(e.g., Pierson [195o], Pierson et al 195o, 1954. Payne, 1988, 1994 There is a close analogy between the flow in Fig. 1 and the flow under a flat planing plate, shown in Fig.…”
Section: Water Rise and Splash-upmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…(e.g., Pierson [195o], Pierson et al 195o, 1954. Payne, 1988, 1994 There is a close analogy between the flow in Fig. 1 and the flow under a flat planing plate, shown in Fig.…”
Section: Water Rise and Splash-upmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The underwater surface was recorded and both models were found to experience instability when the wetted surface remained close to the keel (the waterplane became narrow). Katayama et al developed a sectional heel-restoring moment equation based on formulas proposed by Smiley (1952) and Payne (1994) that showed the heel-restoring force decreased as a result of the point of action Manuscript received at SNAME headquarters May 3, 2012; revised manuscript received October 12, 2012. approaching the keel line. Lewandowski (1996) developed the heel-restoring moment for a planing hull as a static restoring moment combined with a dynamic restoring moment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that V accounts for the wave vertical orbital velocity, thus implicitly including the wave elevation. The crossflow drag term, typically adopted in 2D+t models in order to account for the increase of the added mass in wet-chine conditions, is not included since the incremental added mass coefficient of Payne [20] is considered. This assumption leads to the following formulation of the sectional added mass:…”
Section: 21mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where r is the wave elevation, θ is the pitch angle and zk is the vertical position of the keel line. The formulation of Payne [20] is adopted for the pile-up coefficient. It is worth pointing out that, dealing with a 3-DOF model, the wave direction (with respect to the boat horizontal axis), µ, is accounted in the wave elevation: / = / 012 3012 − 4…”
Section: 21mentioning
confidence: 99%