2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-16663-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent developments and applications of floating treatment wetlands for treating different source waters: a review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 166 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This hanging root-biofilm network of Pistia stratiotes provides a biologically active surface area for biochemical and physical processes such as filtering and entrapment. These submerged long roots capitalize on the contact between the root-biofilm network and the contaminated and polluted water 32 , 33 . These roots also reduce the water velocity which ultimately enhances the microbial activities, sedimentation, plant uptake, transport and biological assimilation rates, thus enhancing pollutant removal efficiency (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This hanging root-biofilm network of Pistia stratiotes provides a biologically active surface area for biochemical and physical processes such as filtering and entrapment. These submerged long roots capitalize on the contact between the root-biofilm network and the contaminated and polluted water 32 , 33 . These roots also reduce the water velocity which ultimately enhances the microbial activities, sedimentation, plant uptake, transport and biological assimilation rates, thus enhancing pollutant removal efficiency (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metals are generally linked with sulfides in anaerobic soils, forming insoluble sulfides in water. Moreover, the physicochemical parameters of water in FTWs, such as pH, temperature, DO, and organic material levels might alter heavy metal removal effectiveness and subsequent release [54][55][56].…”
Section: Current Problems and Prospects Of Using Plants For Wastewate...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, FTWs do not need any complicated technical mechanisms for their installation or manufactured chemical input to sustain functional processes or for maintenance. Hence, low construction and operating costs make this technology a particularly reasonable and practical method in developing countries [56]. According to the research, a 201 m 3 constructed wetland costs approximately 445 USD (1 USD = 176 PKR), a 158 m vertical flow constructed wetland (VFCW) requires 574 USD, a 251 m 3 horizontal flow constructed wetland (HFCW) requires 1425 USD, a 272 m 3 reed system costs 1040 USD, and a secondary constructed wetland costs 1874 USD (it always varies area to area) [106].…”
Section: Typha Latifoliamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, N and P release to surface water bodies primarily originates from agricultural and industrial wastewater runoff, sewage, fossil fuels, stormwater runoff and domestic wastewater (Tang et al 2017;Mustafa and Hayder, 2021). A study by Shen et al (2021) reported that the concentration of total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) in most natural water bodies was within 0.95-8.56 mg L -1 and 0.04-0.73 mg L -1 , respectively. Moreover, about 301,565 tonnes of N and 14,845 tonnes of P have been discharged from Polish territory into the Baltic Sea, which is equivalent to 30% and 39% of total inputs into the Baltic Sea and makes Poland the fifth highest polluter among the Baltic region (Wojciechowska et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%