Recent Development of the Intellectual Property Rights System in China and Challenges Ahead

Huang, Can

doi:10.1017/mor.2017.2

Cited by 37 publications

(24 citation statements)

References 8 publications

(9 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Therefore, a notable trend in the field of the latest management technologies is establishment of an organizational culture as an environment where a unique amalgamation of norms, values and behavioral models defines the way of uniting employees for achievement of strategic goals of the company. At the same time, understanding of variability of organizational culture impact at different levels of analysis becomes a crucial firm-level factor, enabling the company to take a stand and form new business model innovations [19], transforming knowledge, ideas, technologies and resources into economic values, and linking ideas and technologies to their economic results.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Impact of the Organizational Culture on the Employee Proactivity: Empirical Study in Innovation Oriented Companies

Эсаулова¹,

Semenova²,

Molodchik³

2019

Proceedings of the 2nd International Scientific Conference on New Industrialization: Global, National, Regional Dimension (SICN

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The achievement of a new industrial leadership in the world arena is directly related to the development and sustainable competitiveness of modern innovation oriented organizations. Practice shows that companies capable of maximally using the initiative of ordinary workers, their professional competence and independence, turn the routine, monotonous, performing work into instrumental-experimental, innovative activity of creative professionals achieve the greatest success. At the same time, the formation of management approaches that allow combining personnel initiative with its target-focused application in the organization is still an unsolved problem for many innovation oriented companies. This study analyzes the impact of the organizational culture on the personality mechanisms of employee proactivity that facilitate their self-fulfillment through participation in initiative activity. The empirical study has been conducted in the Russian companies on the basis of the model of employee proactivity potential, including self-leadership, self-directed learning, and engagement, describing the behavioral dominants of initiative employees. As a result of the study, it has been established that employees with different dominants of proactive behavior have different perceptions of significance of norms, rules and values concentrated in the company culture, which does not depend on the age or size of the company, but can be related to certain cultural traits caused by priority areas in the activity of the companies included in the study. It has been established that initiative increase in the employees with "self-leadership" dominant is facilitated by teamwork-focused value attitude; with "selfdirected learning" dominant-by significance and encouragement of the employee's self-development drive; with "engagement" dominant-by affinity and interrelatedness between life goals and interests of the employee and those of the company. The obtained results demonstrate that unfolding of the intrinsic energy of employees in the purposes of organizational development is facilitated by shaping a culture on the basis of value attitudes that take into account the dominants of initiative behavior. This finding contributes to the understanding of the role of organizational culture in a modern innovation oriented company.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Impact of the Organizational Culture on the Employee Proactivity: Empirical Study in Innovation Oriented Companies

Эсаулова¹,

Semenova²,

Molodchik³

2019

Proceedings of the 2nd International Scientific Conference on New Industrialization: Global, National, Regional Dimension (SICN

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This is because the distribution of patent value is extremely unbalanced because many patents have a low value and compartively few patents have high value (Harhoff, Narin, Scherer & Vopel, 1999; Schankerman & Pakes, 1986). In addition, many patent applications by enterprises are strategic, political, and symbolic, which means the purpose of applying for patents is to obtain subsidies or other resources, rather than carry out real innovation activities to meet the actual market demand or technological development needs (Huang, 2017; Jiang, He & Lu, 2019; Li, 2012; Li & Zheng, 2016).…”

Section: Framework and Measurementmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The results can be explained using explicit indicators and duration. In terms of explicit indicators, these indicators of patent quantity are clearly required in policy texts, so firms must achieve such requirements to guarantee projects, as previous studies have shown (Huang, 2017; Jiang et al, 2019; Li & Zheng, 2016). With regard to duration, the “top‐down” projects usually last for a longer period, generally 2–3 years, while the “bottom‐up” projects last for a relatively shorter period, generally 1–2 years, and the time frame for the latter often includes one year before the project is granted.…”

Section: Innovation Policy Performancementioning

confidence: 99%

State Capacity and Innovation Policy Performance: A Comparative Study on Two Types of Innovation Projects in China

Feng

Jiang

2021

Review of Policy Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study analyzes state capacity by comparing two types of innovation policies in China and estimating its impacts on policy performance. State capacity is defined as the extent to which the state can realize its objectives in policy and it is determined by government professionalism and penetration into industrial activities. Due to both the lack of channels to grasp information regarding complicated innovation processes and professional personnel capable of understanding such information, the state capacity demonstrated in these policies is low. The government relies more on indicators of innovation quantity rather than those of innovation quality as criteria for identifying innovation. This leads to poor policy performances in which grantees tend to meet only the qualitative requirements of the policies, namely increasing the number of patents, rather than engaging in genuine innovation and pursuing the essential objective of the policies. Therefore, even with market‐oriented reform, transitional economies like China still need to strengthen state building for achieving policy objectives.

show abstract

“…First, while China keeps imitating the West to develop its domestic institutions such as a proper intellectual property rights (IPR) regime, the Chinese entrepreneurs may have created a unique way of addressing problems associated with a formal institutional void (Puffer et al , 2010). It is argued that China is on the way to voluntarily improve its IPR protection as it sees the needs to protect home-made IPR (Cheng and Huang, 2016; Huang, 2017), just as what the US did when the US transformed itself from an IPR violator to an IPR protector in the late nineteenth-century (Peng et al , 2017a, 2017b).…”

Section: Overview Of Research and Special Issue Articlesmentioning

confidence: 99%

A global perspective of entrepreneurship and innovation in China

Ahlström

Yang

Wang

et al. 2018

MBR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose-This paper aims to study largely recent aspects of entrepreneurship and innovation in China. It synthesizes the research in the current special issue (SI) of Multinational Business Review (MBR) on this topic. In addition, this paper differs from other work on this topic in examining entrepreneurship and innovation from a more global standpoint with relevant international effects. Design/methodology/approach-The paper provides an overview of the literature on entrepreneurship, innovation and key related topics such as firm and economic growth, as well as linking this research to related international works. It also summarizes the papers of the SI. Findings-The authors' analysis suggests that the study of entrepreneurship and innovation should be placed in the context of a country's economic development and institutional environment as well as the firm internationalization trajectories and business models. In addition, the authors believe that a good understanding of economic growth in a transition economy like China (which is a key goal of China's recent emphasis on innovation) is facilitated by understanding the comparative advantages and disadvantages of an economy with respect to the global innovation system. Originality/value-The authors' study explores the local-global and parent-subsidiary connectivity and co-evolution of firm strategies and the institutional environment in entrepreneurship and innovation in emerging and transition economies. The authors summarize and synthesize the papers in this SI to provide the results as well as some directions for future research in the domain of entrepreneurship, innovation and new venture creation, which is believed to be a key engine of economic growth in the coming years.

show abstract

Recent Development of the Intellectual Property Rights System in China and Challenges Ahead

Cited by 37 publications

References 8 publications

The Impact of the Organizational Culture on the Employee Proactivity: Empirical Study in Innovation Oriented Companies

The Impact of the Organizational Culture on the Employee Proactivity: Empirical Study in Innovation Oriented Companies

State Capacity and Innovation Policy Performance: A Comparative Study on Two Types of Innovation Projects in China

A global perspective of entrepreneurship and innovation in China

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About