2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.12.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent cocaine use and the incidence of hemodynamic events during general anesthesia: A retrospective cohort study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…17 For example, acute cocaine intoxication increases blood pressure, but chronic cocaine use followed by abstinence increases the need for blood pressure support during anesthesia. 18 Our current study highlights the possible impact of prior, but nonacute, cannabis exposure on blood pressure perturbations during anesthetic FIG. 1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…17 For example, acute cocaine intoxication increases blood pressure, but chronic cocaine use followed by abstinence increases the need for blood pressure support during anesthesia. 18 Our current study highlights the possible impact of prior, but nonacute, cannabis exposure on blood pressure perturbations during anesthetic FIG. 1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Although cumulatively there were more reported periprocedural adverse events in patients with active cocaine use compared to patients with remote cocaine use undergoing endoscopy, the primary result of this study was that ultimately this difference was statistically insignificant. Moreover, the statistically significant differences in preprocedural and postprocedural hemodynamics both within and across groups were, much like in the Baxter et al [ 13 ] study, not deemed clinically significant[ 14 ]. There was no reported mortality in any of the groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Baxter and Alexandrov[ 13 ] showed statistically significantly higher baseline systolic pressure, mean arterial pressure, and heart rate differences in the cocaine-positive cohort, but ultimately these were not deemed clinically significant values. More recently, Moon et al [ 14 ] determined that cocaine positive patients did not demonstrate significantly different medication requirements as compared to cocaine-negative patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 13–16 This is further validated by recent studies examining the incidence of hemodynamic events under anesthesia to be similar between patients who screen positive for stimulants and patients who have a negative UDS, with the rates of vasopressor use during surgery similar between both groups. 17–19 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13][14][15][16] This is further validated by recent studies examining the incidence of hemodynamic events under anesthesia to be similar between patients who screen positive for stimulants and patients who have a negative UDS, with the rates of vasopressor use during surgery similar between both groups. [17][18][19] It can be difficult to separate the effects of acute and chronic stimulant use. While we do not know the duration of substance use for each patient, 28.6% and 31.6% of the amphetamine and cocaine group, respectively, in our population had a documented history of chronic substance use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%