The majority (∼70%) of surface buried in protein folding is hydrocarbon, whereas in DNA helix formation, the majority (∼65%) of surface buried is relatively polar nitrogen and oxygen. Our previous quantification of salt exclusion from hydrocarbon (C) accessible surface area (ASA) and accumulation at amide nitrogen (N) and oxygen (O) ASA leads to a prediction of very different Hofmeister effects on processes that bury mostly polar (N, O) surface compared to the range of effects commonly observed for processes that bury mainly nonpolar (C) surface, e.g., micelle formation and protein folding. Here we quantify the effects of salts on folding of the monomeric DNA binding domain (DBD) of lac repressor (lac DBD) and on formation of an oligomeric DNA duplex. In accord with this prediction, no salt investigated has a stabilizing Hofmeister effect on DNA helix formation. Our ASA-based analyses of model compound data and estimates of the surface area buried in protein folding and DNA helix formation allow us to predict Hofmeister effects on these processes. We observe semiquantitative to quantitative agreement between these predictions and the experimental values, obtained from a novel separation of coulombic and Hofmeister effects. Possible explanations of deviations, including salt-dependent unfolded ensembles and interactions with other types of surface, are discussed.Hofmeister salts | m-values | thermodynamics S alts typically exert both specific (Hofmeister) and nonspecific (coulombic) effects on biomolecular processes (1-6). To manipulate and probe biopolymer processes using salts, it is extremely important to develop quantitative methods to interpret and predict these effects in terms of structure. coulombic, valencespecific effects of salt ions (due to screening of surface charges) are most significant at relatively low salt concentrations (<0.1 M). At higher concentrations (>0.1 M), ion-specific effects and relatively nonspecific osmotic effects (due to the lowering of water activity) become increasingly significant. In 1888, Franz Hofmeister discovered that the effectiveness of salts for protein precipitation generally followed a specific order, regardless of the protein being investigated (7). Since then, the so-called Hofmeister series of salt effects has been observed in physical properties of aqueous salt solutions (e.g., surface tension and surface potential) (8, 9), as well as salt effects on a variety of macromolecular processes (e.g., micelle formation, "salting out" nonpolar compounds, and protein folding) (10-13). The general ranking of ions, in decreasing order of effectiveness (best to worst) in driving processes where surface area is buried (e.g., folding and precipitation) or macroscopic surface is lost (transfer of water from the air-water interface to bulk), is as follows (14):Although it is generally accepted that interactions of salts with hydrocarbon surface are unfavorable and salt-specific, following the above order (1,3,11,(14)(15)(16), less is known about the interactions of Hofmeister sa...