2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2010.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent analyses of the excavated textile find from Grave 35 HTR73, Kerameikos cemetery, Athens, Greece

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The spectra were consistent, both along the warps and the wefts, of all the different textiles analysed. As far as fibre identification was concerned, none of the spectra showed any bands assigned to characteristic components of proteins, not giving thus any evidence for the presence of either silk or wool fibres in the find [46]. In addition, there were samples that showed all the bands assigned to the characteristic components of cellulose, as mentioned above and in Table 1 (reflectance mode column), indicating organic matter had been preserved in the fibres analysed.…”
Section: The Kerameikos Textilesmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The spectra were consistent, both along the warps and the wefts, of all the different textiles analysed. As far as fibre identification was concerned, none of the spectra showed any bands assigned to characteristic components of proteins, not giving thus any evidence for the presence of either silk or wool fibres in the find [46]. In addition, there were samples that showed all the bands assigned to the characteristic components of cellulose, as mentioned above and in Table 1 (reflectance mode column), indicating organic matter had been preserved in the fibres analysed.…”
Section: The Kerameikos Textilesmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The possibility of the presence of wild silk in one of the textiles of a pyre burial from Argos in the Peloponnese has also been suggested (Margariti and Papadimitriou 2014: 14-23). However, recent analyses of the Kerameikos fifth-century BC textile, that had been previously reported as silk, have not confirmed the earlier analytical results (Hundt 1969: 66-70;Margariti et al 2011;Spantidaki 2016…”
Section: Animal Fibresmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…For one of the Archaic textiles from Argos, a combination of wild silk (weft) and cellulosic bast (warp) fibres has been suggested, while another seems to have been made of wool (weft) and cellulosic bast (warp) fibres (Margariti and Papadimitriou 2014). Combinations of fibres in the same textile have also been reported for the Kerameikos textiles, despite the fact that definitive fibre identification is still awaited (Margariti et al 2011;Spantidaki 2016).…”
Section: Plant Fibresmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Good performed protein and amino acid compositional analysis as well as morphological fibre identification on three threads from this grave, establishing that it was wild silk from the Pachypasa otus moth, native to the Mediterranean (Good 1995: 965;2010: 37;2011: 219). While Good's results seem to confirm Hundt's identification of the Kerameikos textiles as silk, merely adjusting them from Chinese to Mediterranean silk, recent re-examination of four of the textiles by Margariti et al (2011) has arrived at very different results, namely that they were cellulosic bast and some of them possibly cotton fibres. Methods applied were Environmental Scanning Electron Microscopy (ESEM) and Fourier Transform Infrared Microscopy (FTIR).…”
Section: Kerameikosmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…This was accompanied by a map of Eurasia, mapping and listing possible silks outside China before the Han period (Good 1995). As attention has been called to the fact that the first of Good's silks had never been identified as such (Bender Jørgensen 1992: 105) and three more have been refuted by other scholars (Banck 1994: 51;Banck-Burgess 1999: 234-40;Margariti et al 2011), it is surprising to find them all firmly in place as early instances of silk in Good's contribution to the recent Andrew Sherratt memorial volume, now without question marks or references to the contrasting identifications published by other researchers (Good 2011: 221). Moreover, Good's identification of two of the pieces as silk was based upon the same method, amino acid compositional analysis (Good 2011: 219), that Banck-Burgess and her team had used to establish that no silk was present in one of these (Banck-Burgess 1999: 234-40).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%