1966
DOI: 10.1086/627198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent Algal Stromatolites from the Canary Islands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
2

Year Published

1969
1969
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…An examination of the depth distribution of both confirmed and unconfirmed records shows that the majority of the unconfirmed records are from deeper water than the confirmed records ( Figure 2). Although deep water rhodoliths are known worldwide (Bosence, 1983), with the maximum depth of rhodolith growth in the Canary Islands being 60-70 m (McMaster and Conover, 1966), the maximum depth of maerl in Ireland has been quoted as 32 m (Briand, 1991), whilst maerl gravel occurs up to 44 m depth in Scapa Flow, Orkney (D. Donnan, personal communication). Thus the exact sedimentary nature of these records must await confirmation, but they are included in the present compilation because of their potentially high conservation value.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An examination of the depth distribution of both confirmed and unconfirmed records shows that the majority of the unconfirmed records are from deeper water than the confirmed records ( Figure 2). Although deep water rhodoliths are known worldwide (Bosence, 1983), with the maximum depth of rhodolith growth in the Canary Islands being 60-70 m (McMaster and Conover, 1966), the maximum depth of maerl in Ireland has been quoted as 32 m (Briand, 1991), whilst maerl gravel occurs up to 44 m depth in Scapa Flow, Orkney (D. Donnan, personal communication). Thus the exact sedimentary nature of these records must await confirmation, but they are included in the present compilation because of their potentially high conservation value.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The forereef rhodoliths are common on deep forereef to shelf margins or on the banks and seamounts of tropical reef regions that are below the depths at which abundant corals can survive. These rhodoliths: (i) are pebble-to cobble-sized and spheroidal to ellipsoidal in shape, associated with less abundant irregularly shaped forms; (ii) are composed of multispecific nongeniculate coralline algae and several individuals of one (to a few) species of encrusting foraminifer(s); and (iii) consist of coralline algae, the thalli of which are mainly encrusting to warty to lumpy forms (McMaster & Conover 1966;Focke & Gebelein 1978;Montaggioni 1979;Rezak et al 1985;Reid & MacIntyre 1988;Prager & Ginsburg 1989;Minnery 1990;Littler et al 1991;Tsuji 1993;Iryu et al 1995;Bassi et al 2008). The rhodoliths recovered from the older Pleistocene sequence in Tahiti are analogous to modern forereef rhodoliths with regard to their shape, internal structure, and composition.…”
Section: Nongeniculate Coralline Algae As Depth Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As studied by Gebelein (1969) at Bermuda, these structures are now forming in about 1-8 m of water. However, they (and the related rhodolites of red algal origin) are known to occur at much greater depths (McMaster & Conover, 1966;Bosellini & Ginsburg, 1971) down to 100 m. It is uncertain whether sand-movements at this depth provide the conditions for their overturning and consequent growth, or whether the water has deepened and they are a 'drowned' occurrence (both could of course occur). I concluded on the basis of evidence then available (Elliott, 1966) that the Oman oncolites formed below low tide level (say 2-3 m).…”
Section: Fossil Representatives: Recognition Of Former Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%