2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2016.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent advances on failure and recovery in networks of networks

Abstract: Until recently, network science has focused on the properties of single isolated networks that do not interact or depend on other networks. However it has now been recognized that many realnetworks, such as power grids, transportation systems, and communication infrastructures interact and depend on other networks. Here we will present a review of the framework developed in recent years for studying the vulnerability and recovery of networks composed of interdependent networks. In interdependent networks, when… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 for more details). Solutions of the system (17), shows that the population of oscillators in each layer splits into two groups, namely drifting and frequency locked oscillators [66]. The phases of the latter ones are entrained by the mean-field and correspond to fixed point solutions of the system (15), i.e.φ σ = 0.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 for more details). Solutions of the system (17), shows that the population of oscillators in each layer splits into two groups, namely drifting and frequency locked oscillators [66]. The phases of the latter ones are entrained by the mean-field and correspond to fixed point solutions of the system (15), i.e.φ σ = 0.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we propose a general framework for modelling interactions between dynamical systems. Two fundamental and ubiquitous ways in which nodes in one system can influence nodes in another one are interdependency or cooperation, as in critical infrastructures [11,16,17] or among financial networks [18,19], and competition or antagonism, which is common in ecological systems [20,21], social networks [4], or in the human brain [1,22]. It is not uncommon to find interdependent and competitive interactions simultaneously, in predator-prey relationships in ecological systems [23], in binocular rivalry in the brain [24], or even in phenomena like "frenemies" and "coopetition" in social systems [25].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Buldyrev et al developed a model of interdependent networks and found analytically that the percolation transition is discontinuous due to the emergence of cascading failures between the networks. A framework for understanding the robustness of interdependent networks was then developed, and found that a system of interdependent networks undergoes an abrupt first-order percolation phase transition [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In figure 5, we see that the cascade begins random-like, with no spatial influence within the neighborhood of the failure and a random branching process with expected branching factor of »1, as established for interdependent random networks [28,60,62]. However, this random-like behavior is constrained to the neighborhood of radius z a .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%