“…Among the various electrode materials for PEC water splitting that have been reported, TiO 2 is extensively chosen owing to its cost-effectiveness, chemical and thermal stability, nontoxicity, resistance to photocorrosion, and advantageous band edge levels that facilitate water oxidation. , Particularly, one-dimensional TiO 2 nanotube arrays (TNA) grown on Ti substrate through electrochemical anodization are the preferred choice as photoanode because of their highly organized nanostructure, controllable size, large surface area, and efficient carrier transport channels. − However, TNA also has two primary shortcomings: the wide band gap restricting effectively utilization of visible (vis)–IR light and rapid recombination of photogenerated charge carriers. ,, Among various enhanced modified strategies, such as element doping, quantum dot photosensitization, heterojunction, and cocatalyst, − the incorporation of defective Ti 3+ -induced oxygen vacancy (O V ) into the lattice of TNA by hydrogenation can effectively capture vis–IR light and facilitate the separation of photoinduced electron–hole pairs. − Furthermore, the construction of a heterojunction between TNA and a narrow bandgap semiconductor is also an effective strategy to enhance full-spectrum light absorption and promote carrier separation at the heterointerface . Recently, Cd x Zn 1– x S (CZS) solid solution has garnered significant attention due to its adjustable bandgap position, extensive visible light response, and better stability compared to CdS, making it an ideal candidate for surface modification of TiO 2 . ,− Despite these advantages, CZS/TNA as a photoanode still fails to sufficiently capture IR light and lacks surface active sites for water oxidation.…”