2020
DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.21981.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent advances in the treatment of pancreatic cancer

Abstract: F1000 Faculty Reviews are written by members of the prestigious . They are F1000 Faculty commissioned and are peer reviewed before publication to ensure that the final, published version is comprehensive and accessible. The reviewers who approved the final version are listed with their names and affiliations. AbstractPancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is one of the deadliest solid tumor malignancies and is projected to become a leading cause of cancer-related death in coming years. Improving quality of life and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It remains a challenging disease due to its aggressive nature, late clinical presentation, early metastasis to local and distant organs, and inherent resistance to current therapies [5,6]. The standard management relies on cytotoxic chemotherapy, primarily fluorinated pyrimidine antimetabolites (gemcitabine, fluorouracil), topoisomerase I inhibitor (irinotecan), DNA crosslinking agents (oxaliplatin, cisplatin), tubulin inhibitors (paclitaxel, nab-paclitaxel) as well as other regimens [7][8][9]. However, these therapeutic options showed limited therapeutic response and outcome in a subset of PC patients and often resulted in high toxicity [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It remains a challenging disease due to its aggressive nature, late clinical presentation, early metastasis to local and distant organs, and inherent resistance to current therapies [5,6]. The standard management relies on cytotoxic chemotherapy, primarily fluorinated pyrimidine antimetabolites (gemcitabine, fluorouracil), topoisomerase I inhibitor (irinotecan), DNA crosslinking agents (oxaliplatin, cisplatin), tubulin inhibitors (paclitaxel, nab-paclitaxel) as well as other regimens [7][8][9]. However, these therapeutic options showed limited therapeutic response and outcome in a subset of PC patients and often resulted in high toxicity [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the results of preclinical and clinical studies discussed above and presented in summary tables suggest, the application of monoclonal antibody-based agents in the treatment of pancreatic cancer is more likely to be successful when used in combination with other therapies such as cytotoxic drugs, other mAbs, cancer vaccines and/or oncolytic viruses. In addition, simultaneous targeting of signalling pathways, the tumour stroma and the incorporation of immune checkpoint inhibitors could yield better results by modifying the immunosuppressive environment of pancreatic tumours [ 70 , 177 , 178 , 179 , 180 , 181 ].…”
Section: Challenges and Future Opportunities With Antibody Therapeutics In Pancreatic Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The trial comparing extracellular matrix degrader pegvorhyaluronidase alfa (PEGPH20) was stopped as its primary end-point was not met[ 200 ]. The results of the clinical trial AVENGER 50 comparing modified FOLFIRINOX with or without CPI-613 are awaited[ 201 ].…”
Section: Advances In Systemic Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%