Computational Materials Discovery 2018
DOI: 10.1039/9781788010122-00352
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent Advances in the Theory of Non-carbon Nanotubes

Abstract: Our classical understanding of hollow inorganic nanostructures, established by Linus Pauling in 1930 and recommenced by Reshef Tenne 25 years ago, has undergone a revolution in recent years, owing to the rapid growth of computational facilities and to the new experimental and theoretical techniques looking into the origin of properties at an atomistic level. This overview gathers both the basic concepts and the most recent results from the diverse and broad field of computational materials science devoted to n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 158 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[48] Therefore, the same classification for labeling these tubes was used as for nanotubes rolled up from hexagonal compounds (graphite, h-BN, metal dichalcogenides, etc.). [7] Depending on the rolling direction B in the 2D lattice B ¼ na 1 þ ma 2 (a 1 , a 2 are lattice vectors of the hexagonal lattice, Figure 1), three classes of nanotubes can be constructed: zigzag (n,0), armchair (n,n), and "chiral" (n,m) nanotubes with n 6 ¼ m. The main attention was focused on the chirality (12,0) as the chirality of natural and synthetic imogolites in the majority of earlier reports, which unit cell consists of 336 atoms. To perceive the permanence of registered phenomena, the models of (8,0) and (14,0) imogolite nanotubes were studied, containing 224 and 392 atoms in the unit cells, respectively.…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[48] Therefore, the same classification for labeling these tubes was used as for nanotubes rolled up from hexagonal compounds (graphite, h-BN, metal dichalcogenides, etc.). [7] Depending on the rolling direction B in the 2D lattice B ¼ na 1 þ ma 2 (a 1 , a 2 are lattice vectors of the hexagonal lattice, Figure 1), three classes of nanotubes can be constructed: zigzag (n,0), armchair (n,n), and "chiral" (n,m) nanotubes with n 6 ¼ m. The main attention was focused on the chirality (12,0) as the chirality of natural and synthetic imogolites in the majority of earlier reports, which unit cell consists of 336 atoms. To perceive the permanence of registered phenomena, the models of (8,0) and (14,0) imogolite nanotubes were studied, containing 224 and 392 atoms in the unit cells, respectively.…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two kinds of hydroxyl groups offer the interesting applications of imogolite as proton conductor, ion retention medium, and a backbone of channel devices. As a consequence, theoretical investigations of imogolite nanotubes have been devoted to a more profound study of interplay between their structure and formation mechanism, thermodynamic stability, adhesive and mechanical properties, using all levels of theory-phenomenological, molecular mechanics, and quantum-chemical descriptions (see reviews [7,[16][17][18]). Departed from consideration of perfect imogolite nanotubes, the modern theoretical research focuses on their intrinsic and extrinsic defects as progenitors of peculiar properties and as elements required for targeted functionalization of imogolite.…”
Section: Numerous Studies Determining Peculiarities Of Atommentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This has been especially observed in carbon nanotubes (CNTs), which exhibit a wealth of intriguing properties depending upon their structural chirality . Many candidate nanotubes have been extensively screened for this transformation in theoretical studies. Despite this growing interest, however, the structural and electronic properties of these candidates are not well-understood as compared with CNTs, due to the poor controllability over their constitution. Critically, isolation of their single walls is needed to measure electronic properties related to their chirality.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%