1990
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-61297-8_20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent Advances in the Structure Analysis of Rhodopseudomonas viridis Reaction Center Mutants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…viridis re vealed that one of the m utants, referred to as T 4 (Tyr L222 to Phe) was sensitive to the urea type inhibitors [32] in common with the PS II reaction centre. In addition, the semiquinone-iron EPR sig nal of Q B-in T 4 resembled that reported for PS II [33], X-ray crystallographic analysis of the reac tion centre from T 4 with bound D C M U [34] pro vide us with potential ligand-residue binding in teractions with the D 1 protein. In light of these observations, we propose that one binding orien- tation for D C M U in the Q B-binding pocket is sta bilized by a predom inantly electrostatic interac tion between the carbonyl group (CARB) o f the herbicide and the imidazoyl side chain of His 215 (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…viridis re vealed that one of the m utants, referred to as T 4 (Tyr L222 to Phe) was sensitive to the urea type inhibitors [32] in common with the PS II reaction centre. In addition, the semiquinone-iron EPR sig nal of Q B-in T 4 resembled that reported for PS II [33], X-ray crystallographic analysis of the reac tion centre from T 4 with bound D C M U [34] pro vide us with potential ligand-residue binding in teractions with the D 1 protein. In light of these observations, we propose that one binding orien- tation for D C M U in the Q B-binding pocket is sta bilized by a predom inantly electrostatic interac tion between the carbonyl group (CARB) o f the herbicide and the imidazoyl side chain of His 215 (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Re placement of Val 219 by lie in line with the m uta tion inducing D C M U resistance [25] increases the interm olecular energy between the more bulky lie side chain and the DM A group (Table II) and makes binding unfavourable. Non-bonded stabili zation also occurs between the phenyl moiety (PHE) of the D C M U and Ala 251 and Asn 266 but ring stacking between this group and the side chain of Phe 255 in a similar m anner to the inter action with Phe L 216 of the bacterial reaction centre [34] was not apparent. However, replace ment o f Phe 255 by Tyr does not significantly alter the overall binding energy between DCM U and the protein (Tables II and III) in agreement with its reported failure to induce resistance to the her bicide [36], In our model, replacement of Ala 251 by Val, another m utation reported to induce resistance to DCM U [37], produces a high intermolecular ener gy between the phenylamino group (AM IN) of the herbicide and the protein as a consequence of the steric interaction with the more bulky side chain of the m utated residue (Table II).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, the binding affinity for the Rp. viridis wild-type RC of terbutryn is 14-fold higher than that of atrazine (47). The reduction in the interplanar angle between the triazine ring and Phe L216 from 24°in the case of atrazine to 17°in the case of terbutryn is probably not sufficient to explain the higher affinity by increased -interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The DCMU structure was moved manually to match the DCMU-binding pattern determined in the crystal structure in a mutant Rps. viridis reaction center (T4) (Sinning et al, 1990;Sinning, 1992). All residues surrounding DCMU were fully energy minimized with ABNR.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…viridis mutants showed that a mutation (L-Y222F) resulted in the reaction center being "PSII-like" by becoming receptive to urea type herbicides (e.g.. DCMU) (Sinning et al, 1989). The X-ray structure of this mutant (T4) reaction center with bound DCMU is available (Sinning et al, 1990;Sinning, 1992). The structure shows that the mutation eliminates the hydrogen bonding between the L-Y222 and M-D43, causing a slight movement of a stretch of M residues that shield the Q B site, thus widening the Q B binding pocket.…”
Section: Herbicide Dcmu Bindingmentioning
confidence: 99%