2021
DOI: 10.3390/rs13224596
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent Advances in the GPR Detection of Grouting Defects behind Shield Tunnel Segments

Abstract: Injecting grout into the gaps between tunnel shield segments and surrounding rocks can reduce ground subsidence and prevent ground water penetration. However, insufficient grouting and grouting defects may cause serious geological disasters. Ground penetrating radar (GPR) is widely used as a nondestructive testing (NDT) method to evaluate grouting quality and determine the existence of defects. This paper provides an overview of GPR applications for grouting defect detection behind tunnel shield segments. Stat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, hidden damage and structural-condition detection cannot be achieved using these methods. GPR detection of grouting defects behind shield tunnel segments was studied for tunnels constructed in soft soil, such as saturated soft clay, silty soft soil, saturated sandy silt and silty sand (Peng et al, 2021). GPR was also employed to identify areas of delaminated and deteriorated concrete, voids behind the liner and areas of high moisture concentration within and behind the liner (Nako, 2018).…”
Section: Figure (1): Unlined Rock-blast Tunnelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, hidden damage and structural-condition detection cannot be achieved using these methods. GPR detection of grouting defects behind shield tunnel segments was studied for tunnels constructed in soft soil, such as saturated soft clay, silty soft soil, saturated sandy silt and silty sand (Peng et al, 2021). GPR was also employed to identify areas of delaminated and deteriorated concrete, voids behind the liner and areas of high moisture concentration within and behind the liner (Nako, 2018).…”
Section: Figure (1): Unlined Rock-blast Tunnelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to its advantages of non-damage, fast and simple, the detection results are universal, and it is widely used in concrete quality testing at present [3,4]. The GPR method has a good effect in grouting defect detection after shield tunnel segment [5], but the interpretation of radar image results is more dependent on professional technicians. The impact elastic wave method uses elastic wave to carry a large amount of defect information in the propagation process and is not affected by other interference factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is necessary to develop automatic subsurface object detection methods for GPR data analysis. In recent years, several studies have been conducted on the automatic detection of subsurface defects with GPR via traditional machine learning techniques [6,7], and deep learning methods [8,9]. However, all of the proposed algorithms for detection are mostly based on B-scan images only and primarily designed to detect subsurface regular targets with hyperbolic properties [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%