2021
DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2020.620153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent Advances in the Direct Electron Transfer-Enabled Enzymatic Fuel Cells

Abstract: Direct electron transfer (DET), which requires no mediator to shuttle electrons from enzyme active site to the electrode surface, minimizes complexity caused by the mediator and can further enable miniaturization for biocompatible and implantable devices. However, because the redox cofactors are typically deeply embedded in the protein matrix of the enzymes, electrons generated from oxidation reaction cannot easily transfer to the electrode surface. In this review, methods to improve the DET rate for enhanceme… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 157 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such live-cell biocatalysts have the advantages of cost-effectiveness, high specificity, operation at room temperature and pressure, and self-replication. The electron delivery from the electrode to bacteria has been reported to use direct electron transport through the biofilm matrix [12][13][14][15] or indirect transfer via artificial or self-producing mediators, highlighting the need to investigate further improvements in the system performance [8,10,16]. Slow biofilm development on an electrode and low cell growth in suspension has frequently been highlighted as problems in Abbreviations: MES, Microbial electrosynthesis; NR, Neutral Red; HNQ, 2-hydroxy-1,4-naphthoquinone; OC, No mediator open circuit; MES, MES without a mediator; MES-NR, MES with NR; MES-HNQ, MES with HNQ.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such live-cell biocatalysts have the advantages of cost-effectiveness, high specificity, operation at room temperature and pressure, and self-replication. The electron delivery from the electrode to bacteria has been reported to use direct electron transport through the biofilm matrix [12][13][14][15] or indirect transfer via artificial or self-producing mediators, highlighting the need to investigate further improvements in the system performance [8,10,16]. Slow biofilm development on an electrode and low cell growth in suspension has frequently been highlighted as problems in Abbreviations: MES, Microbial electrosynthesis; NR, Neutral Red; HNQ, 2-hydroxy-1,4-naphthoquinone; OC, No mediator open circuit; MES, MES without a mediator; MES-NR, MES with NR; MES-HNQ, MES with HNQ.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…were different. Nevertheless, power densities above 1 mW cm −2 were reported in other configurations available in the literature 3,39–42 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Some examples of them are third-generation biosensors [63] and microbial and enzymatic bio-fuel cells (BFCs) (BFCs). [64,65] On the other hand, in some particular cases, the MET approach was successfully implemented for highly sensitive and active biosensors. [66,67] To date, there are few significative reports approaching the DET from the use of microbes, [68][69][70][71] however about 100 enzymes, including alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH), [58] fructose dehydrogenase (FDH), [72] cytochrome c (Cyt c), [73,74] and glucose oxidase (GOx) [75,76] are known to be capable of working in DET conditions.…”
Section: Frank N Crespilho Is An Associate Professor Of Physical Chem...mentioning
confidence: 99%