2022
DOI: 10.1002/mabi.202100383
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent Advances in Synthetic and Natural Biomaterials‐Based Therapy for Bone Defects

Abstract: Synthetic and natural biomaterials are a promising alternative for the treatment of critical-sized bone defects. Several parameters such as their porosity, surface, and mechanical properties are extensively pointed out as key points to recapitulate the bone microenvironment. Many biomaterials with this pursuit are employed to provide a matrix, which can supply the specific environment and architecture for an adequate bone growth. Nevertheless, some queries remain unanswered. This review discusses the recent ad… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 339 publications
(394 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Current progress in materials and cell biology has extensively indicated the superiority of multiple biomaterials for preclinical and clinical application upon diverse relapse and recurrent diseases, and in particular, the composites of biomaterials and MSC-exo for tissue engineering and regenerative purposes attribute to the unique biocompatibility. In details, biomaterials with biocompatible and biodegradable properties are capable of facilitating the efficacy of MSCs or MSC-exo and enhancing their manifestations during anti-tumor immunity by endowing the therapeutic ability of these encapsulated constituents [33][34][35]. To date, a variety of biomaterials have been introduced for MSC-exo-based regimens in biomedicine, such as hydrogel acid (HA) (e.g., ε-caprolactone (PCL)/nano-hydroxyapatite (nHA) scaffold, chitosan hydrogel, PCL/nHA + HPCH hybrid scaffolds), gelatin, and nanomaterials [12,36].…”
Section: Biomaterials/msc-exo Compositesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current progress in materials and cell biology has extensively indicated the superiority of multiple biomaterials for preclinical and clinical application upon diverse relapse and recurrent diseases, and in particular, the composites of biomaterials and MSC-exo for tissue engineering and regenerative purposes attribute to the unique biocompatibility. In details, biomaterials with biocompatible and biodegradable properties are capable of facilitating the efficacy of MSCs or MSC-exo and enhancing their manifestations during anti-tumor immunity by endowing the therapeutic ability of these encapsulated constituents [33][34][35]. To date, a variety of biomaterials have been introduced for MSC-exo-based regimens in biomedicine, such as hydrogel acid (HA) (e.g., ε-caprolactone (PCL)/nano-hydroxyapatite (nHA) scaffold, chitosan hydrogel, PCL/nHA + HPCH hybrid scaffolds), gelatin, and nanomaterials [12,36].…”
Section: Biomaterials/msc-exo Compositesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to natural polymers, synthetic polymers can avoid triggering immune reactions in the human body and can be designed to functionally modify the polymer material to meet the desired function of the biomaterial without changing its intrinsic properties [ 64 ]. Polycaprolactone (PCL), poly (lactic acid/L-lactic acid) (PLA/PLLA), poly (glycolic acid) (PGA), poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA), poly (Ethylene Glycol) (PEG), and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) are the most studied synthetic polymers [ 65 , 66 ].…”
Section: Synthetic Polymersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polyurethanes, polyesters, metals such as titanium and other synthetic polymers have advantageous properties over natural ones especially because of their abundance, limitless designs and customizable attributes. They require, however, chemical alterations since they lack cell adhesion sites and are, therefore, considered to be less biocompatible [ 1 , 2 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%