2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2015.03.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent advances in silicon-based neural microelectrodes and microsystems: a review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
75
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 118 publications
0
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The recording capabilities may be affected by biocompatibility with the patient [22], [23] y [24], traumatic nerve damage at electrode insertion [25], a bad mechanical adjustment due to the rigid electrode structure [26], tissue softness [27], non-penetration to fascicle [28], and the forces by the immobilization of the transcutaneous connection cables have been subjects treated in many publications in the last years [29], [30] y [31].…”
Section: Intraneural Electrodes For Recordingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recording capabilities may be affected by biocompatibility with the patient [22], [23] y [24], traumatic nerve damage at electrode insertion [25], a bad mechanical adjustment due to the rigid electrode structure [26], tissue softness [27], non-penetration to fascicle [28], and the forces by the immobilization of the transcutaneous connection cables have been subjects treated in many publications in the last years [29], [30] y [31].…”
Section: Intraneural Electrodes For Recordingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the development of a single probe capable of simultaneously detecting electrical and chemical signals is of great significance. Implantable micromachined microelectrode arrays represent a versatile and powerful tool to achieve this in vivo (Fekete, 2015;Tseng and Monbouquette, 2012;Wise et al, 2008). The techniques allow for the development of smaller electrodes that provide improved spatial and temporal resolution as well as multiple sensing electrodes with precisely defined geometries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With MEMS technology, the precise definition of electrode size and shape can be realized, and multiple recording/stimulation sites can be fabricated on a single probe shank [9]. Starting with the pioneering work from Wise et al [10], a growing number of silicon-based electrode arrays have been developed in the past and the performances of MEMS silicon microelectrodes have been improved in many aspects [11,12], e.g., three-dimensional arrays [13,14,15], dual-sided microelectrode arrays [16], integrated electronics or microfluidic channels [17,18,19,20,21,22], silicon probes for optical stimulation and imaging [23,24,25,26,27,28] or neurochemical signals detection [29,30,31]. In addition, one of the most important fabrication advancements is to integrate a greater number of recording sites on a single probe shank and simultaneously minimizing the probe geometry to avoid large tissue damages during the insertion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%