2021
DOI: 10.1007/s40123-021-00394-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent Advances in Screening and Treatment for Amblyopia

Abstract: Amblyopia is the most common cause of monocular visual impairment in children, with a prevalence of 2-3%. Not only is visual acuity reduced in one eye but binocular vision is affected, fellow eye deficits may be present, eye-hand coordination and reading can be affected, and self-perception may be diminished. New technologies for preschool vision screening hold promise for accessible, early, and accurate detection of amblyopia. Together with recent advances in our theoretical understanding of amblyopia and tec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the movie group, but not in the patching group, children who had a clinical history of no visual acuity improvement in response to treatment with glasses and patching had a larger visual acuity improvement at the 2-week primary outcome visit than children who previously had responded to treatment with glasses and patching. This could reflect better adherence to binocular treatment in the setting of a randomized clinical trial than adherence to patching prior to enrollment or, alternatively, may result from individual differences in treatment efficacy of binocular versus patching treatments 28 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the movie group, but not in the patching group, children who had a clinical history of no visual acuity improvement in response to treatment with glasses and patching had a larger visual acuity improvement at the 2-week primary outcome visit than children who previously had responded to treatment with glasses and patching. This could reflect better adherence to binocular treatment in the setting of a randomized clinical trial than adherence to patching prior to enrollment or, alternatively, may result from individual differences in treatment efficacy of binocular versus patching treatments 28 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible that patching adherence was poor just prior to enrollment and may have improved as a result of participation in a randomized clinical trial 29 . Without objective compliance data, it is not possible to attribute the response to patching solely to an improvement in treatment adherence 28 , 30 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to refractive correction, both physical patching of the strong eye and pharmacological penalization via atropine were found to be effective treatments [ 103 , 104 , 105 ]. Recent reviews support their continued use and demonstrate greater efficacy over alternative treatments such as optical penalization (Plano lens) [ 106 , 107 , 108 ].…”
Section: Amblyopiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These limitations have led to the development of several new approaches over the last decade or so, including perceptual learning, videogame play, and dichoptic/binocular treatment aimed at reducing the inhibition of the amblyopic eye and improve binocular vision and stereopsis (for reviews, see Bennett, Bex, Bauer, & Merabet, 2019 ; Birch, Kelly, & Wang, 2021 ; Brin, Chow, Carter, Oremus, Bobier, & Thompson, 2021 ; Coco-Martin et al, 2020 ; Falcone, Hunter, & Gaier, 2021 ; Foss, 2017 ; Hess & Thompson, 2015 ; Levi, 2020 ; Levi, 2022 ; Levi & Li, 2009 ). These approaches either use or could be adapted to use XR devices, which include VR, AR, and MR devices, which are immersive technologies and can swap or merge the natural environment with virtual content (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%