2019
DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.16903.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent advances in proximity-based labeling methods for interactome mapping

Abstract: Proximity-based labeling has emerged as a powerful complementary approach to classic affinity purification of multiprotein complexes in the mapping of protein–protein interactions. Ongoing optimization of enzyme tags and delivery methods has improved both temporal and spatial resolution, and the technique has been successfully employed in numerous small-scale (single complex mapping) and large-scale (network mapping) initiatives. When paired with quantitative proteomic approaches, the ability of these assays t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
117
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
117
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequently, streptavidin-purified proteins can be identified and quantified by mass spectrometry (Figure 1B). When appropriate controls and mass spectrometric quantification are employed (as discussed elsewhere - (18)(19)(20)), PDB-MS can report on specific proximity relationships. It is important to keep in mind that what PDB-MS provides is a qualitative metric of the relative proximity between bait and prey and cannot explicitly determine whether the detected proteins are physically interacting (either directly or indirectly), or whether they are simply localized to the same area.…”
Section: Downloaded Frommentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Subsequently, streptavidin-purified proteins can be identified and quantified by mass spectrometry (Figure 1B). When appropriate controls and mass spectrometric quantification are employed (as discussed elsewhere - (18)(19)(20)), PDB-MS can report on specific proximity relationships. It is important to keep in mind that what PDB-MS provides is a qualitative metric of the relative proximity between bait and prey and cannot explicitly determine whether the detected proteins are physically interacting (either directly or indirectly), or whether they are simply localized to the same area.…”
Section: Downloaded Frommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the introduction of the first PDB-MS approach (reviewed in (18,19,21,22)), a growing number of enzymes -that largely fall into two groups: the biotin protein ligases and the peroxidases -as well as additional tools and experimental designs have made the strategy a flexible mainstay of interaction and organellar proteomics. Here, we will focus on the molecular basis for the main proximitydependent biotinylation approaches and on the development of distinct toolsets for the application of proximity dependent biotinylation to different biological questions.…”
Section: Downloaded Frommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, PBL has emerged as a powerful complementary approach to classic affinity purification of multiprotein complexes in mapping of protein-protein interactions [23] . By fusing proteins of interest to enzymes that generate reactive molecules, most commonly biotin, adjacent proteins are covalently labeled so that they can be isolated and identified [22] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Promiscuous biotin ligases have emerged as powerful tools for proximity-based protein identification in live cells (48). To date, the original E. coli BirA* (BioID) has been employed by four studies in Plasmodium spp ., including two that targeted BioID to the PV (4952).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%