2017
DOI: 10.3390/nano7050094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent Advances in Nanomaterials for Gene Delivery—A Review

Abstract: With the rapid development of nanotechnology in the recent decade, novel DNA and RNA delivery systems for gene therapy have become available that can be used instead of viral vectors. These non-viral vectors can be made of a variety of materials, including inorganic nanoparticles, carbon nanotubes, liposomes, protein and peptide-based nanoparticles, as well as nanoscale polymeric materials. They have as advantages over viral vectors a decreased immune response, and additionally offer flexibility in design, all… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
179
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 305 publications
(193 citation statements)
references
References 121 publications
(199 reference statements)
1
179
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…(Gao, Kim, & Liu, 2007;Karimi et al, 2015). Considering the induction of high immune response and carcinogenicity risks after viral vector exposure, recent efforts have shifted toward nonviral methods (Nayak & Herzog, 2010;Ramamoorth & Narvekar, 2015;Riley & Vermerris, 2017). However, some of the nonviral approaches might have lower ability to transverse nuclear membrane, lower efficiency and poor transgene expression, and/or some biosafety issues (Ramamoorth & Narvekar, 2015;T.…”
Section: Anticancer and Other Drugs' Deliverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Gao, Kim, & Liu, 2007;Karimi et al, 2015). Considering the induction of high immune response and carcinogenicity risks after viral vector exposure, recent efforts have shifted toward nonviral methods (Nayak & Herzog, 2010;Ramamoorth & Narvekar, 2015;Riley & Vermerris, 2017). However, some of the nonviral approaches might have lower ability to transverse nuclear membrane, lower efficiency and poor transgene expression, and/or some biosafety issues (Ramamoorth & Narvekar, 2015;T.…”
Section: Anticancer and Other Drugs' Deliverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gene therapy affords a promising and efficient way to treat congenital and acquired diseases by delivering therapeutic genes into target cells to promote or rectify the expression of specific genes . In recent years, with the rapid development of nanotechnology, many DNA and RNA delivery systems such as non‐viral gene carriers have become available that can be used for gene therapy instead of viral carriers .…”
Section: The Remaining Percent Of the Fluorescence Intensity In Fluormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The delivery of oligonucleotide or genetic material to specific cells has been a long‐term goal for treatment of intractable diseases such as cancer, cystic fibrosis, retinal disorders, and cardiovascular disease. A range of potential gene delivery systems, both viral and non‐viral, have been used for the delivery of pDNA, siRNA, mRNA, and miRNA . Viral gene delivery systems have high efficiencies and generally show good transfection properties in vitro and in vivo, with several in clinical trials, and one (Glybera) recently approved in the EU .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the advantages of non‐viral gene delivery vectors, in the past they have been slow to progress to clinical use due to their generally lower efficiency of gene delivery. Recent understanding of the barriers to efficient non‐viral vector delivery, such as nanoparticle instability in vivo, poor targeting to specific cells, and inefficient transport through biological barriers such as the cell membrane, has led to an increased number of candidate vectors currently in clinical trials . However, further improvements in these areas are still needed to realise the potential of gene‐based therapies, in particular in the treatment of cancers, where approaches such as suicide gene therapy, regulation of gene expression by delivery of miRNA, p53 replacement gene therapy, and redirection of T‐cell specificity towards cancer cells have recently shown promise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%