2019
DOI: 10.5194/amt-12-5863-2019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent advances in measurement techniques for atmospheric carbon monoxide and nitrous oxide observations

Abstract: fraction reported by near-IR CRDS instruments. This is reflected in the results of parallel measurement campaigns, which clearly indicate that drying the sample air leads to an improved accuracy of CO measurements with such near-IR CRDS instruments.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The precision of common GC analysers is < 0.5 ppb (Rapson and Dacres, 2014;van der Laan et al, 2009) while the precision of QCL was found to be about 0.3 ppb for measurements made at 10 Hz and 0.05 ppb for 1 Hz; but in some cases might be even higher (~1 ppt) (Curl et al, 2010;Rapson and Dacres, 2014;Savage et al, 2014). Zellweger et al (2019), for instance, used laboratory QCL for the calibration of N2O reference standards to inform the internationally accepted calibration scale of the Global Atmosphere Watch Programme of the World Meteorological Organisation. Similarly, Rosenstock et al (2013) preferred lab-based QCL to verify the accuracy and precision of different photoacoustic spectrometers.…”
Section: Measurement Performance Of Qcl Analysismentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The precision of common GC analysers is < 0.5 ppb (Rapson and Dacres, 2014;van der Laan et al, 2009) while the precision of QCL was found to be about 0.3 ppb for measurements made at 10 Hz and 0.05 ppb for 1 Hz; but in some cases might be even higher (~1 ppt) (Curl et al, 2010;Rapson and Dacres, 2014;Savage et al, 2014). Zellweger et al (2019), for instance, used laboratory QCL for the calibration of N2O reference standards to inform the internationally accepted calibration scale of the Global Atmosphere Watch Programme of the World Meteorological Organisation. Similarly, Rosenstock et al (2013) preferred lab-based QCL to verify the accuracy and precision of different photoacoustic spectrometers.…”
Section: Measurement Performance Of Qcl Analysismentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This process for N 2 O is described in detail by Zellweger et al. (2019). Atmospheric research laboratories, including the NIWA Gas Laboratory in Wellington, produce their own working standards and quantify them on the current WMO scale by means of the scale transfer gases supplied by the CCL.…”
Section: Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With respect to applying these WMO compatibility goals it should be mentioned that these precisions should be seen as the scientifically desirable level of compatibility for concurrent measurements of wellmixed background air by different laboratories, while they may not be the currently achievable best 1σ measurement uncertainty (Crotwell and Steinbacher, 2017). Indeed, a recent study by Zellweger et al (2019) indicated that the N 2 O network compatibility goal of 0.1 ppb remains quite challenging to meet even with current state-of-the-art measurement techniques. In Fig.…”
Section: Effects On Other Atmospheric Trace Gasesmentioning
confidence: 99%