2019
DOI: 10.1515/cmam-2019-0097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent Advances in Least-Squares and Discontinuous Petrov–Galerkin Finite Element Methods

Abstract: Least-squares (LS) and discontinuous Petrov–Galerkin (DPG) finite element methods are an emerging methodology in the computational partial differential equations with unconditional stability and built-in a posteriori error control. This special issue represents the state of the art in minimal residual methods in the L^{2}-norm for the LS schemes and in dual norm with broken test-functions in the DPG schemes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where Ω is a bounded domain in R 3 with Lipschitz boundary Γ, (0,T] a time interval, x= (x,y,z) ⊤ the position variable, and ∇ = ∂ ∂x , ∂ ∂y , ∂ ∂z ⊤ the gradient vector. In (2.1), v(x,t) = (v 1 (x,t),v 2 (x,t),v 3 (x,t)) ⊤ is the velocity field and u 0 (x) is the initial condition.…”
Section: Characteristic Finite Element Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where Ω is a bounded domain in R 3 with Lipschitz boundary Γ, (0,T] a time interval, x= (x,y,z) ⊤ the position variable, and ∇ = ∂ ∂x , ∂ ∂y , ∂ ∂z ⊤ the gradient vector. In (2.1), v(x,t) = (v 1 (x,t),v 2 (x,t),v 3 (x,t)) ⊤ is the velocity field and u 0 (x) is the initial condition.…”
Section: Characteristic Finite Element Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In case of convection-dominated flows, the conventional Eulerian finite element methods use up-stream weighting in their implementations to stabilize the discretization. For example, the most popular Eulerian finite element methods are the streamline upwind Petrov-Galerkin methods [3,5,11], the Taylor-Galerkin methods [8,12,16] and the Galerkin/least-squares methods [3,9,26]. However, truncation errors generated by the time integration in these conventional Eulerian methods are dominant and require Courant-Friedrichs-Lewy (CFL) stability conditions which impose sever restrictions on the time steps used in the numerical computations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these computational techniques can be classified into three main categories: (i) Eulerian methods, (ii) Lagrangian methods and (iii) semi-Lagrangian methods. In the framework of finite elements, the most popular Eulerian methods are the streamline upwind Petrov-Galerkin methods [9,11], Galerkin/least-squares methods [9,26] and Taylor-Galerkin methods [12,13]. However, it is well known that these Eulerian methods do not perform very satisfactory in the case of convection-dominated problems unless small time steps and highly refined grids are used in the simulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a vast amount of literature on various techniques designed to take care of the numerical instabilities associated with this type of equations. We refer the reader to recent and classical works on the subject focused on some of these techniques: mixed FE methods [11,8,19,7,10]; discontinuous Galerkin methods [12,15,17,20]; discontinuous Petrov-Galerkin methods [5,14,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%