Recent Advances in H2S Removal from Gas Streams

Alguacil, Francisco Jose

doi:10.3390/app13053217

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 80 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The existing widespread desulfurization techniques [8][9][10][11] are absorption (usually chemical scrubbing using sodium hydroxide), adsorption [12], membrane filtration and biofiltration [13], mostly on biotrickling filters (BTF). A life cycle assessment of desulfurization techniques comparing biological filtration, chemical scrubbing and adsorption on impregnated activated carbon (AC) demonstrated that BTFs are more favorable in terms of environmental impact compared to other techniques, with chemical scrubbing being the worst technique [14].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Hybrid Filtration Process for Gas Desulfurization

Germain,

Poser,

Peu

et al. 2023

Processes

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A hybrid desulfurization process combining a physical filtration stage on cellular concrete (CC abiotic filter, called CCAF) and a biotrickling filter (called BTF) filled with expanded schist as packing material was used to remove high H2S concentrations from a synthetic gas containing dinitrogen (N2), dioxygen (O2) and H2S without the addition of a nutritive solution. Provided that small amounts of oxygen are present in the gas (1.2 ± 0.1% in volume), the global removal efficiency was 100%, and the global removal capacity reached 35 ± 2 gH2S m−3 h−1 for a total empty bed residence time (EBRT) of 120 s (CCAF + BTF). The resilience of the desulfurization process was demonstrated by applying severe changes in the H2S concentrations, from 160 to 1150 ± 20 mg m−3 for an EBRT = 120 s. According to the performances of the abiotic filter, which can decline over time due to the lifetime of the cellular concrete (137 days), the biotrickling filter reacted either as a refining system or as an efficient system able to treat significant H2S loading rates (up to 45 ± 3 gH2S m−3 h−1). Depending on the operating conditions, the increase in the pressure drops of the biotrickling filter (from 45 ± 3 to 234 ± 8 Pa m−1) highlighted biomass accumulation, especially extremophilic Acidithiobacillus sp. Considering the cellular concrete abiotic filter alone, removal capacities of up to 56 ± 3 gH2S m−3 h−1 were recorded for an EBRT of 60 s, demonstrating that gases such as landfill biogas or household biogas could be efficiently treated using this simple technique.

show abstract