Characterization of Food 1995
DOI: 10.1016/b978-044481499-9/50006-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent advances in characterization of foods using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…frozen storage time for both soy and wheat dough varieties (Table 2). Although the observed T 1 times may be slightly less than actual T 1 spin-lattice values due to cross-relaxation behaviours (Watanabe, Fukuoka, & Watanabe, 1995), soy dough exhibited shorter T 1 times for the majority population at every time point, suggesting that the water molecules were more translationally and/or rotationally hindered than those in the wheat dough (Ruan et al, 1999). Literature on spin-lattice relaxation experiments in dough performed using high field NMR (>7.05 T, 300 MHz 1 H frequency) is sparse and, due to the strong dependence of T 1 relaxation times on field strength, it is not appropriate to compare results to data collected at low field strength (ca.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…frozen storage time for both soy and wheat dough varieties (Table 2). Although the observed T 1 times may be slightly less than actual T 1 spin-lattice values due to cross-relaxation behaviours (Watanabe, Fukuoka, & Watanabe, 1995), soy dough exhibited shorter T 1 times for the majority population at every time point, suggesting that the water molecules were more translationally and/or rotationally hindered than those in the wheat dough (Ruan et al, 1999). Literature on spin-lattice relaxation experiments in dough performed using high field NMR (>7.05 T, 300 MHz 1 H frequency) is sparse and, due to the strong dependence of T 1 relaxation times on field strength, it is not appropriate to compare results to data collected at low field strength (ca.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Due to the discrepancy in population distribution, it is hypothesised that the populations that were defined in the T 1 and T 2 relaxation experiments are not the same populations. Strong exchange and cross-relaxation properties can affect relaxation properties differently (Watanabe et al, 1995), so it may be best to analyse these data separately. With increasing frozen storage time, water appeared to migrate from P 2 (the higher mobility fraction) to P 1 (the lower mobility fraction), so that P 1 contributed to approximately 90% of the signal in frozen dough (Table 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%