2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.micron.2015.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent advances in 3D SEM surface reconstruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
57
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There has been a long interest in the development and application of microscale 3D characterization either using non‐invasive SEM by means of multi‐view photogrammetric techniques (3D SEM) or using destructive slice&view methods with focus ion beam milling (SEM‐FIB) . Figure C shows the result of applying the 3D SEM approach on the Cu‐Zn‐Al pellet using multi‐view photogrammetry on a collection of 2D SEM images acquired from 36 viewpoints around the catalyst body (see Experimental Section).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been a long interest in the development and application of microscale 3D characterization either using non‐invasive SEM by means of multi‐view photogrammetric techniques (3D SEM) or using destructive slice&view methods with focus ion beam milling (SEM‐FIB) . Figure C shows the result of applying the 3D SEM approach on the Cu‐Zn‐Al pellet using multi‐view photogrammetry on a collection of 2D SEM images acquired from 36 viewpoints around the catalyst body (see Experimental Section).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…, ; Tafti et al. , ). Eulitz & Reiss () describe a broadly similar approach to that utilized in this study, but their approach used manual control of the SEM and utilized just 40 images for their reconstruction of a single model of a rabbit glomerulus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, SfM 3D photogrammetry reconstruction techniques applied to SEM datasets have previously relied upon complex workflows and custom-written code and demonstrated only limited ability to recreate complex 3D structures (e.g. Cornille et al, 2003;Tafti et al, 2015). Eulitz & Reiss (2015) describe a broadly similar approach to that utilized in this study, but their approach used manual control of the SEM and utilized just 40 images for their reconstruction of a single model of a rabbit glomerulus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vast literature of used techniques for the problem of surface reconstruction can be categorized into three major classes: a) single-view, b) multi-view, and c) hybrid strategies [15]. In single-view approaches, using varying lighting (electron beam) directions on a single perspective, a group of 2D SEM micrographs are captured and utilized for 3D SEM surface modeling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zolotukhin et al [31] studied the pros and cons of SfM algorithm focusing on two-view 3D SEM surface reconstruction problem. Tafti et al [15] reviewed the state-of-the-art 3D SEM surface reconstruction solutions, addressing several enhancements for the research study, and developed a sparse multi-view algorithm to tackle 3D SEM surface modeling problem. Using machine learning solutions and adaptive strategies, Tafti et al [32] proposed an improved sparse feature-based multi-view method which outperforms their earlier work in terms of accuracy and computation demands.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%