“…81 However, this situation is reasonable and can be understandable because the Sc(P x ,V 1Àx )O 4 solid solutions belong to the family of selfactivated phosphors whose luminescence is mainly due to the existence of complex groups and/or defects. 82 As a result, in most cases, the self-activated phosphors usually can only show QE values less than 50%, such as those summarized by Dang et al, 83 Huang et al, 84 and Zhou et al, 85 83 and those summarized by Huang et al, 84 and Zhou et al 85 Looking into the IQE and/or EQE values we obtained, it is obvious that some of them, typically for the Sc(P 0.3 ,V 0.7 )O 4 sample, are comparable to and can even be higher than those of many reported self-activated phosphors and some other RE/non-RE doped crystals, such as ScVO 4 :0.02Bi 3+ (l ex = 330 nm xenon lamp, EQE = 35%), 25 CsPbCl 3 (l ex = 360 nm xenon lamp, QY = 26.0 AE 0.3%), 90 Cs x K 1Àx PbCl 3 :Eu 3+ (l ex = 365 nm xenon lamp, EQE = 31.2%), 91 and CsPbCl 3 :Mn 2+ (l ex = 360 nm xenon lamp, QY = 27%). 92 Moreover, the improved thermal stability (T 50% ) of 480.15 K and/ or activation energies (DE a ) of 0.51 eV for the Sc(P 0.4 ,V 0.6 )O 4 solutions are also higher than or comparable to those of some RE/non-RE doped phosphors, for example, La 2 MgTiO 6 :0.005Bi 3+ (l ex = 350 nm xenon lamp, T 50% = B175 1C, DE a = 0.27 eV), 4 La 2 MgTiO 6 :0.005Bi 3+ (l ex = 410 nm xenon lamp, T 50% = B250 1C, DE a = 0.252 eV), 6 CaSc 2 O 4 :Ce 3+ (l ex = 437 nm, T 50% = B225 1C, DE a = 0.195 eV), 60 (DE a = 0.469 eV, T 50% = B60 1C), 94 CsVO 3 (DE a = 0.31 eV).…”