2013
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.f2493
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Receiver operating characteristic curves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
197
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 162 publications
(201 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
197
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of definite food allergy for sIgE values was performed and the null hypothesis of whether the area under the ROC curve was 0.5 was tested. 26 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of definite food allergy for sIgE values was performed and the null hypothesis of whether the area under the ROC curve was 0.5 was tested. 26 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) methods [13][14][15] were used to examine sensitivity and specificity for all possible breakpoints using a logistic regression model. The Youden index, 13 J = (sensitivity + specificity − 1), was calculated at each breakpoint.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study showed that using 0.00029 µg/ml of uKIM-1 as a cut-off value could exclude histological changes with 100% accuracy; whereas 42% of those with a uKIM-1 over this threshold were false positives (no histological change). Both sensitivity and specificity are relevant to assessment of the usefulness of a diagnostic method (Bewick et al, 2004). ROC analysis can guide selection of the optimal cut-point for decision-making.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ROC analysis can guide selection of the optimal cut-point for decision-making. To confirm a diagnosis, high specificity (> 95%) (Westin, 2001), or a high positive likelihood ratio is required (Bewick et al, 2004). Although a cut-off of over 0.00044 µg/ml showed a very high likelihood ratio (LR = 7), only 60% of animals that had kidney damage were detected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%