1975
DOI: 10.1109/tcom.1975.1092907
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Receiver Design for Multilevel Digital Optical Fiber Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

1981
1981
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results obtained by means of an example say, that P*. 1 ' may amount to one fifth of the average transmitter pulse power without impairing the system performance significantly. A further theoretical investigation allows the conclusion that systems operating with low-attenuation OWG's (less than l dB/km) should have low-loss splices and long-length OWG's in order to approach the maximum possible repeater spacing as closely as possible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results obtained by means of an example say, that P*. 1 ' may amount to one fifth of the average transmitter pulse power without impairing the system performance significantly. A further theoretical investigation allows the conclusion that systems operating with low-attenuation OWG's (less than l dB/km) should have low-loss splices and long-length OWG's in order to approach the maximum possible repeater spacing as closely as possible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This has the advantage of being able to use practicerelated parameters even for the calculation of 2 < N-level systems (otherwise ε would have to be newly defined as a theoretical quantity). By substitution of (16) in (6) the length dependence of P c is introduced in the system calculation, which is of importance to the optimization of the repeater spacing 1 according to (1). This has been done for a 140-Mbit/s system at λ = 1.3 μιη for two different attenuation coefficients α = 0.5 dB/km and ct = 1.2 dB/km.…”
Section: Effect Of Constant Radiation Power and Splicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Expression (10) shows that the bit rate apparently does not influence the shot noise. However, a different normalisation also appears in the literature [7,8]. In this case the received pulses, h p 2 (t), are required to verify a different area-normalisation condition:…”
Section: Shot-noise Variancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optiinuiii ciirreiit for the smallest transistor on the array to minirnite Iioke i5 0.2 mA. [2] ;Vormahzing Amplzfaer…”
Section: Preamplifiermentioning
confidence: 99%