2018
DOI: 10.1109/tii.2017.2760915
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Received Signal Strength Based Indoor Positioning Using a Random Vector Functional Link Network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the comparison with existing methods (UKF, EKF, nonlinear regression (NR), MDS, RVFL) [11], [17], [22], [23], we implemented their algorithms in the same environment of our lab with the best choices of parameters to ensure the fairness of the comparison. The results of moving horizon estimation and particle filter method are from [32], [36], [41].…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Range-based Localization Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the comparison with existing methods (UKF, EKF, nonlinear regression (NR), MDS, RVFL) [11], [17], [22], [23], we implemented their algorithms in the same environment of our lab with the best choices of parameters to ensure the fairness of the comparison. The results of moving horizon estimation and particle filter method are from [32], [36], [41].…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Range-based Localization Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the experimental results in the existing range-based localization methods [11], [17], [22], [23], we find that their performance in the altitude direction is generally not as good as other directions. Some possible solutions include: (i) Adding altitude sensors such as Laser beam or Lidar to measure the altitude, but it requires the ground to be even; (ii) Placing anchors on the ceiling, but it may also be difficult for many environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many indoor localization methods have been proposed in academia as well as in industry. Typical indoor localization methods like Wi-Fi [4][5][6][7][8][9], Bluetooth [10], ultrasound (US) [11], infrared (IR) [12], radio frequency identification (RFID) [13,14], magnetic field (MF) [15], and ultra-wideband (UWB) [16] methods, have been investigated. Indoor positioning systems estimate the location by using different types of measurements, such as angle of arrival (AOA), time of arrival (TOA), time difference of arrival (TDOA), and received signal strength (RSS).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, the experimental results showed that the algorithm was more robust to changing environments. Cui et al [8] proposed a random vector functional link network (RVFL) to develop an efficient and robust indoor positioning system. Luo et al [9] proposed a multifloor identification model called MA_LDA to find the floor number and LL_KNN algorithm to obtain the location information of a target on the floor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wi-Fi indoor positioning technology can be divided into two categories: range-based and range-free. According to the way of obtaining characteristic parameters, the range-based positioning technology includes positioning based on time of arrival (TOA) [8], positioning based on time difference of arrival (TDOA) [9], positioning based on angle of arrival (AOA) [10], and positioning based on received signal strength indicator (RSSI) [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%