2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10620-021-06927-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Receipt of Serial Endoscopy Procedures Prior to Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Diagnosis Is Associated with Better Survival

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In another cohort study of 5532 patients based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End-Results Medicare database, serial surveillance endoscopy was associated with EAC being diagnosed in a localized stage (OR: 2.95; 95% CI: 2.07-4.19). 16 Even when adjusting for lead-time and length-time bias, improved survival rate was noted in patients who received serial endoscopies (HR: 0.45; 95% CI: 0.37-0.55). The reasons for these disparate results are many:…”
Section: Role Of Surveillance In Management Of Ndbementioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In another cohort study of 5532 patients based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End-Results Medicare database, serial surveillance endoscopy was associated with EAC being diagnosed in a localized stage (OR: 2.95; 95% CI: 2.07-4.19). 16 Even when adjusting for lead-time and length-time bias, improved survival rate was noted in patients who received serial endoscopies (HR: 0.45; 95% CI: 0.37-0.55). The reasons for these disparate results are many:…”
Section: Role Of Surveillance In Management Of Ndbementioning
confidence: 93%
“…In another cohort study of 5532 patients based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End-Results Medicare database, serial surveillance endoscopy was associated with EAC being diagnosed in a localized stage (OR: 2.95; 95% CI: 2.07–4.19). 16 Even when adjusting for lead-time and length-time bias, improved survival rate was noted in patients who received serial endoscopies (HR: 0.45; 95% CI: 0.37–0.55). The reasons for these disparate results are many: (1) most of these are retrospective cohort studies or are based on administrative claims data; (2) they may not have adequately addressed lead-time and length-time bias; (3) they have excluded younger populations with aggressive tumors who are already dead; and (4) lack of standardized surveillance biopsy protocols and inferior optical resolution for identifying abnormal areas of mucosa in the older studies.…”
Section: Role Of Surveillance In Management Of Ndbementioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, endoscopic resection still has limitations and is more commonly used as a diagnostic method than a treatment. A retrospective cohort study demonstrated that, compared to patients who did not undergo continuous endoscopic examination, patients who underwent continuous endoscopy before the diagnosis of EAC were associated with less advanced locoregional staging, better prognosis and survival[ 9 ].…”
Section: Endoscopic Resection: Growing In Importancementioning
confidence: 99%