2022
DOI: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.3013
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Receipt of Out-of-State Telemedicine Visits Among Medicare Beneficiaries During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Abstract: IMPORTANCE Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, states implemented temporary changes allowing physicians without a license in their state to provide care to their residents. There is an ongoing debate at both the federal and state levels on whether to change licensure rules permanently to facilitate out-of-state telemedicine use. OBJECTIVETo describe out-of-state telemedicine use during the pandemic.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(35 reference statements)
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, both studies 1,3 demonstrate that interstate telehealth is primarily an issue of maintaining existing clinician-patient relationships. Although a small percentage of patients may seek new clinicians across state borders, most interstate health care we observed 3 consisted of established patient care.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Third, both studies 1,3 demonstrate that interstate telehealth is primarily an issue of maintaining existing clinician-patient relationships. Although a small percentage of patients may seek new clinicians across state borders, most interstate health care we observed 3 consisted of established patient care.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, both studies 1,3 show that patients who live in rural areas are more likely to receive care from an interstate clinician than those who live in nonrural areas. Mehrotra…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the article titled “Receipt of Out-of-State Telemedicine Visits Among Medicare Beneficiaries During the COVID-19 Pandemic” 1 published on September 16, 2022, in JAMA Health Forum , there were errors in some of the header text in Table 3. In 4 places where it previously read “distance category” it now correctly reads “diagnosis category.” This article was corrected online.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%