AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum 2019
DOI: 10.2514/6.2019-1165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Receding-Horizon Trajectory Planning for Multiple UAVs Using Particle Swarm Optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are other methods applied to path planning with UAV swarms. For example, Vijayakumari et al make use of Particle Swarm Optimization for optimal control of multiple UAVs in a decentralized way [27]. They manage to simplify the computation of the problem by means of discretization.…”
Section: Evolutionarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are other methods applied to path planning with UAV swarms. For example, Vijayakumari et al make use of Particle Swarm Optimization for optimal control of multiple UAVs in a decentralized way [27]. They manage to simplify the computation of the problem by means of discretization.…”
Section: Evolutionarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Control optimization research focuses on evolutionary algorithms [13] including genetic algorithms [14,15] and particle swarm optimization [16,17]. Some papers show implementation of particle swarm optimization for single-quadcopter controllers [18][19][20], UAV formations [21][22][23], UAV trajectory optimization [24], UAV movement planning [25] and UAV formations [26] in an uncertain environment. However, swarm optimization for vector field-controlled UAV formations remains under-researched.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, the latter refers to the implementation of point-to-point routes in a known environment. Trajectory planning usually combines the dynamic model [7] with the motion planning to solve the overall optimal control issue of the moving body, which leads to other problems, e.g., high complexity, complicated operation, and low computational efficiency, greatly increasing the difficulty of its application [8]. At present, the track planning algorithms are mainly divided into four cate-gories: (i) the schematic method consisting of the general view method, the Voronoi diagram method, and the contour method [9][10][11]; (ii) the unit decomposition plan composed of the grid and the quadtree method [12]; (iii) the artificial potential field method consisting of the wave propagation method and the harmonic function method [13,14]; (iv) the heuristic planning method based on the genetic algorithm and the neural network algorithm [15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%