1984
DOI: 10.1017/s0033291700003676
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recall and recognition in mildly disturbed schizophrenics: the use of matched tasks

Abstract: SynopsisUnlike previous studies, this study shows that in controlled conditions non-chronic schizophrenics receiving neuroleptic medication show no disparity between recall and recognition. Patients receiving both neuroleptic and anticholinergic drugs show this disparity, performing less well on recall than on recognition. These patients also seem more severely disturbed. The importance of task matching, drugs and chronicity are discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, patients taking any medication with anticholinergic activity (either benztropine or antipsychotics) were significantly impaired relative to the other patients in free recall but not in recognition. These results are compatible with previous research (Calev, 1984 ;Perlick et al 1986;Paulsen et al 1995). Our data suggest that drugs with anticholinergic properties affect memory by impeding semantic organization at encoding, in agreement with Strauss et al (1990).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, patients taking any medication with anticholinergic activity (either benztropine or antipsychotics) were significantly impaired relative to the other patients in free recall but not in recognition. These results are compatible with previous research (Calev, 1984 ;Perlick et al 1986;Paulsen et al 1995). Our data suggest that drugs with anticholinergic properties affect memory by impeding semantic organization at encoding, in agreement with Strauss et al (1990).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Which components of memory are specifically affected by those drugs has not been clearly established. Calev (1984) showed that anticholinergic drugs affected free recall rather than recognition. Likewise, Perlick et al (1986) and Paulsen et al (1995) reported that higher serum anticholinergic level and anticholinergic drug dosage were correlated with deficit in free recall, but not in recognition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in keeping with other studies showing that impairment in the Morris maze was observed only when more than 20% of the dorsal hippocampus was damaged (Moser et al ., 1993). The experiments thus strongly indicate that memory deficit, a well‐documented feature of schizophrenia (Calev, 1984a,b; Cutting, 1985; Goldberg et al ., 1989; McKenna et al ., 1990; Gold et al ., 1992; Tamlyn et al ., 1992; Elliot & Sahakian, 1995; McKay et al ., 1996; Meltzer & McGurk, 1999; Sharma & Antonova, 2003) can result from habenula damage. Spatial memory may be particularly pertinent to schizophrenia, as spatial learning in rodents is considered as a model of declarative memory in humans (O'Keefe & Nadel, 1978), and declarative memory appears to be selectively impaired in schizophrenia (Perry et al ., 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Arguing against the interpretation that this differential level of deficit is an artifact of the discriminating power of the performance measure employed (Chapman & Chapman, 1973;Chapman & Chapman, 1978) is a report that chronic non-demented schizophrenic patients showed a larger deficit on a free recall compared to a performance matched recognition task (Calev, 1984a). This result was obtained despite the higher reliability for the recognition task, which would have predicted a higher discriminating power for the recognition versus the recall task, but also see (Calev, 1984b) and (Mohamed et al, 1999). Several reviews have concluded that mean verbal recall performance is among the measures that show strong familial effects in relatives of schizophrenic patients (Sitskoorn et al, 2004;Whyte et al, 2005;Trandafir et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%