2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recalibration of temporal order perception by exposure to audio-visual asynchrony

Abstract: The perception of simultaneity between auditory and visual information is of crucial importance for maintaining a coordinated representation of a multisensory event. Here we show that the perceptual system is able to adaptively recalibrate itself to audio-visual temporal asynchronies. Participants were exposed to a train of sounds and light flashes with a constant time lag ranging from -200 (sound first) to +200 ms (light first). Following this exposure, a temporal order judgement (TOJ) task was performed in w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

43
345
6
6

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 345 publications
(403 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
43
345
6
6
Order By: Relevance
“…It is noteworthy that while the direction of the PSS shifts observed after lag-adaptation to A200V was consistent with seminal reports on temporal recalibration (Fujisaki et al, 2004;Vroomen et al, 2004), the PSS following V200A lag-adaptation did not shift in the direction predicted by seminal temporal recalibration effects. Nevertheless, the latter finding remains consistent with other lag-adaptation reports (Miyazaki et al, 2006;Yamamoto et al, 2012) and major differences in experimental design including the choice of task and the absence of readapting trials in the TOJ assessment task could account for these differences (Cai et al, 2012;Yamamoto et al, 2012).…”
Section: Non-stationarity Of the Entrained Neural Oscillations Duringsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is noteworthy that while the direction of the PSS shifts observed after lag-adaptation to A200V was consistent with seminal reports on temporal recalibration (Fujisaki et al, 2004;Vroomen et al, 2004), the PSS following V200A lag-adaptation did not shift in the direction predicted by seminal temporal recalibration effects. Nevertheless, the latter finding remains consistent with other lag-adaptation reports (Miyazaki et al, 2006;Yamamoto et al, 2012) and major differences in experimental design including the choice of task and the absence of readapting trials in the TOJ assessment task could account for these differences (Cai et al, 2012;Yamamoto et al, 2012).…”
Section: Non-stationarity Of the Entrained Neural Oscillations Duringsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Shifts in perceived AV simultaneity following lag-adaptation (Fujisaki et al, 2004;Miyazaki et al, 2006;Vroomen et al, 2004;Yamamoto et al, 2012) have been hypothesized to originate from mechanisms capable of adjusting the neural processing time across sensory modalities (Fujisaki et al, 2004;Moutoussis and Zeki, 1997;Stone et al, 2001;Sugita and Suzuki, 2003;Zeki and Bartels, 1998). In support of this hypothesis, our study reveals that such mechanisms may be implemented as phase shifts of neural oscillations: contrasting the sensory responses before and after AV lag-adaptation provided no evidence for a latency code hypothesis and instead revealed significant phase shifts of the entrained 1 Hz neural oscillations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most common methods require that participants report either the order of two events (a temporal order judgement; TOJ) or whether two or more events occurred synchronously or asynchronously (a simultaneity judgement; SJ). Intriguingly, when brief auditory and visual stimuli are repeatedly presented slightly out of synch during a period of adaptation, participants subsequently change their judgements in these tasks, consistent with their having developed a new opinion about the most synchronous relationship (Fujisaki, Shimojo, Kashino, & Nishida, 2004;Vroomen, Keetels, de Gelder, & Bertelson, 2004). This effect is known as temporal recalibration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of attention and 'prior entry'-more attention allocated to the first stimulus-may play important roles in the evaluation of the TOT (for review, see Spence et al 2001). Context and prior experience, even if short, also affect the TOT: in a recalibration paradigm, adaptation to intersensory or sensorimotor desynchrony widens the window of tolerance and lowers the precision of order perception under various types of stimulations ( Fujisaki et al 2004;Vroomen et al 2004;Navarra et al 2005;Stetson et al 2006;Vatakis et al 2007;Hanson et al 2008).…”
Section: An Amodal Representational Space For Time Perception?mentioning
confidence: 99%