2011
DOI: 10.21236/ada547532
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rebuilding Institutional Legitimacy in Post-Conflict Societies: An Asia-Pacific Case Study, Interphase 1-2

Abstract: Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and R… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Leximancer identifies core concepts within the data and illustrates how they are related (Leximancer Manual 2005); Leximancer is increasingly being used as a data analysis tool for qualitative data. It identifies themes or concept groups in text data, representing the clustering of key words (Fisk, Cherney, Hornsey, & Smith, 2009). 'The output produced by Leximancer provides a visual representation of these concepts and relationships and a means of quantifying and displaying the conceptual structure of a set of documents' (Fisk et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Leximancer identifies core concepts within the data and illustrates how they are related (Leximancer Manual 2005); Leximancer is increasingly being used as a data analysis tool for qualitative data. It identifies themes or concept groups in text data, representing the clustering of key words (Fisk, Cherney, Hornsey, & Smith, 2009). 'The output produced by Leximancer provides a visual representation of these concepts and relationships and a means of quantifying and displaying the conceptual structure of a set of documents' (Fisk et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It identifies themes or concept groups in text data, representing the clustering of key words (Fisk, Cherney, Hornsey, & Smith, 2009). 'The output produced by Leximancer provides a visual representation of these concepts and relationships and a means of quantifying and displaying the conceptual structure of a set of documents' (Fisk et al, 2009). This method of combining the concept analysis tool Leximancer and thematic analysis has been utilised by researchers in the past (Galea & Loosemore, 2006) to provide a rich understanding of the data and to ensure no aspects are missed in the analysis stage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, although network text analysis is particularly useful for analysing large volumes of text and we have discussed it here in connection with online textual data, it is important to note that it can be used for any type and volume of textual data. We illustrate the process using the Leximancer network text analysis software (Fisk et al, 2009;Smith and Humphreys, 2006), on a body of text that concerns the intersection of information technology and HRM, commonly referred to e-HRM in the literature (see e.g. Bondarouk et al, 2016).…”
Section: Network Text Analysis Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another feature of Leximancer is that 'it also allows the user to request overviews of text sources and key segments of texts in relation to specific concepts and relationships between concepts' (Fisk et al 2009). This feature was seen as a highly useful facet of the Leximancer data mining approach, as it helped single out text sources and key segments of texts in relation to specific concepts under discussion without needing to search through large samples of student blog and microblog text.…”
Section: Concept Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%