1973
DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1973.35.4.538
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rebreathing equilibration of CO2 during exercise.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accurate measurements are not available at higher work intensities. Because normal subjects may increase VT up to -60% of vital capacity during exercise (97), it is probable that VT encroaches on the less-compliant upper portion of the PV curve of the lung under these extreme circumstances, account.ing for some of the increase in the work of breathing (194).…”
Section: Power Output Of Ventilatory Pumpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accurate measurements are not available at higher work intensities. Because normal subjects may increase VT up to -60% of vital capacity during exercise (97), it is probable that VT encroaches on the less-compliant upper portion of the PV curve of the lung under these extreme circumstances, account.ing for some of the increase in the work of breathing (194).…”
Section: Power Output Of Ventilatory Pumpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They performed the hyperoxic rebreathing test previously described both at rest and during exercise at 25 W and, if possible, at 50 W. A 20 min rest period was taken between tests. The carbon dioxide concentration in the bag was increased to 9-5% for the 25 W load and 11.5% for the 50 W load; since the mixedvenous carbon dioxide level increases during exercise relative to the load (Jones & Rebuck, 1973). During the exercise test, the volunteers pedalled at the required load for the initial 5 min period breathing the 50% oxygen mixture, and for the period of rebreathing.…”
Section: Exercisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 Three submaximal workloads of 30, 45, and 60 W (corresponding to ~40, 50, and 60% of peak work rate, respectively) were assessed. Stroke volume (SV; ml) was determined as Q divided by heart rate (HR; beats/min).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%