2022
DOI: 10.3390/su14148375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rebound Effects in Irrigated Agriculture in Uzbekistan: A Stakeholder-Based Assessment

Abstract: There is wide consensus among scholars and practitioners that improved irrigation technologies increase farm productivity and improve resource use efficiency. However, there is also growing empirical evidence that efficiency improvements in irrigation water use may create rebound effects, i.e., they may trigger changes in farmers’ behavior that partly or fully offset the technical water savings expected under ceteris paribus conditions. In extreme cases, total water consumption may even increase. We studied th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Qualitative research papers investigated issues such as institutional and policy frameworks for water resource management; the interconnections between water, energy, and food systems [46,47]; the challenges and opportunities of managing these resources in the region [12]; and the role of science in addressing environmental misperceptions. Additionally, Martius [48] proposed science-based management strategies for water resources, while Hamidov et al [49] explored equitable governance approaches and stakeholder-based assessments of water-related sustainable development. The quantitative research papers examined the gains and losses of new water developments; assessed water and energy use, carbon emissions, and soil salinity changes in the region [50]; and proposed integrative analytical frameworks and optimization models for planning water, food, and energy systems [16,51].…”
Section: Consideration Of the Environment In The Wef Analyses In The Asbmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Qualitative research papers investigated issues such as institutional and policy frameworks for water resource management; the interconnections between water, energy, and food systems [46,47]; the challenges and opportunities of managing these resources in the region [12]; and the role of science in addressing environmental misperceptions. Additionally, Martius [48] proposed science-based management strategies for water resources, while Hamidov et al [49] explored equitable governance approaches and stakeholder-based assessments of water-related sustainable development. The quantitative research papers examined the gains and losses of new water developments; assessed water and energy use, carbon emissions, and soil salinity changes in the region [50]; and proposed integrative analytical frameworks and optimization models for planning water, food, and energy systems [16,51].…”
Section: Consideration Of the Environment In The Wef Analyses In The Asbmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approaches to AWM research and innovation have traditionally been water-centric and focused at the field and scheme scales (Scheierling et al, 2014(Scheierling et al, , 2016Scheierling & Treguer, 2018;Taguta, Dirwai, et al, 2022). While this proved essential for producing 'more crop per drop' at a local scale, there is potential for trade-offs at larger scales such as landscapes and river basins due to the efficiency paradox (Grafton et al, 2018) or the rebound effect as farmers are tempted to expand their area or by switching to high-value water-intensive crops using the saved water (Hamidov, Kasymov, et al, 2022). Thus, improvements in WP at the field and scheme level have not always translated to system-level benefits and the reallocation of water to other users.…”
Section: Nexus Approaches For Thinking Beyond Water In Awmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, as highlighted by Vakulchuk et al (2023), research in English about climate change in Central Asia is quite scarce. In addition, studies in English about the SDGs in Central Asia so far have mainly focused on government policy (Erdogan et al, 2021;Huan et al, 2019), gender equality (Millier & Bellamy, 2014), land (Jiang et al, 2022), and water use (Kulmatov et al, 2020;Chen et al, 2022;Hao et al, 2022;Li et al, 2021;Wang et al, 2022;Hamidov et al, 2022). For Uzbekistan, only a few studies are interested in urban settings (Filimonau et al, 2022;Veckalne & Tambovceva, 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%