Rebooting science? Implications of science 2.0 main trends for scientific method and research institutions

Szkuta, Katarzyna; Osimo, David

doi:10.1108/fs-06-2014-0040

Cited by 13 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 44 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Open science as such is not a new concept, and many terms have been used to refer to the transformation of scientific practices, such as Science 2.0 (Burgelman et al, 2015 ; Szkuta and Osimo, 2016 ). Multiple approaches that exist to the transformation to open science (Fecher et al, 2015 ) are all rooted in the tradition of openness of science.…”

Section: Open Science Is Science For the Twenty-first Centurymentioning

confidence: 99%

Open Science, Open Data, and Open Scholarship: European Policies to Make Science Fit for the Twenty-First Century

et al. 2019

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Open science will make science more efficient, reliable, and responsive to societal challenges. The European Commission has sought to advance open science policy from its inception in a holistic and integrated way, covering all aspects of the research cycle from scientific discovery and review to sharing knowledge, publishing, and outreach. We present the steps taken with a forward-looking perspective on the challenges laying ahead, in particular the necessary change of the rewards and incentives system for researchers (for which various actors are co-responsible and which goes beyond the mandate of the European Commission). Finally, we discuss the role of artificial intelligence (AI) within an open science perspective.

show abstract

Section: Open Science Is Science For the Twenty-first Centurymentioning

confidence: 99%

Open Science, Open Data, and Open Scholarship: European Policies to Make Science Fit for the Twenty-First Century

et al. 2019

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Like the rest of society, the natural sciences have gone digital. Terms like computational science, digital science [8], science 2.0 [9], etc., are indicators that the sciences are leading, or at least keeping up with, the trends. But going digital is also creating new risks and new challenges across society [10].…”

Section: Artifact Design In Computational Sciencementioning

confidence: 99%

Computational Science: A Field of Inquiry for Design Science Research

Baskerville¹

2022

Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The digitalization of science has resulted in the development of essential, specialized, devices and software. Computational science, as a branch of science, is specifically identified as an important, potential area for which it would be helpful to apply design science research. This paper examines computational science, identifies its past and ongoing challenges, and suggests that progressing computational science with design science research can serve as an important area of inquiry for continuing design science research.

show abstract

“…Science is imagined in computational terms. Science as we know it is becoming outdated and in need of an upgrade, or even a 'reboot' -and efforts are needed to make it happen (Dijstelbloem et al 2013, Katarzyna andOsimo 2016).…”

Section: Open Sciencementioning

confidence: 99%

Consolidating RRI and Open Science: understanding the potential for transformative change

Shelley-Egan

Gjefsen

Nydal

2020

Life Sci Soc Policy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In European research and innovation policy, Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) and Open Science (OS) encompass two co-existing sets of ambitions concerning systemic change in the practice of research and innovation. This paper is an exploratory attempt to uncover synergies and differences between RRI and OS, by interrogating what motivates their respective transformative agendas. We offer two storylines that account for the specific contexts and dynamics from which RRI and OS have emerged, which in turn offer entrance points to further unpacking what 'opening up' to society means with respect to the transformative change agendas that are implicit in the two agendas. We compare differences regarding the 'how' of opening up in light of the 'why' to explore common areas of emphasis in both OS and RRI. We argue that while both agendas align with mission-oriented narratives around grand societal challenges, OS tends to emphasize efficiency and technical optimisation over RRI's emphasis on normative concerns and democracy deficits, and that the two agendas thus contrast in their relative legitimate emphasis on doable outcomes versus desirable outcomes. In our conclusion, we reflect on the future outlook for RRI and OS' coexistence and uptake, and on what their respective ambitions for transformation might mean for science-society scholars and scholarship.

show abstract

Rebooting science? Implications of science 2.0 main trends for scientific method and research institutions

Abstract: Acknowledgments (if applicable):

Cited by 13 publications

References 44 publications

Open Science, Open Data, and Open Scholarship: European Policies to Make Science Fit for the Twenty-First Century

Open Science, Open Data, and Open Scholarship: European Policies to Make Science Fit for the Twenty-First Century

Computational Science: A Field of Inquiry for Design Science Research

Consolidating RRI and Open Science: understanding the potential for transformative change

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About