Rebel recruitment and retention in civil conflict

Sawyer, Katherine; Andrews, Talbot M.

doi:10.1080/03050629.2020.1814765

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 49 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…On the contrary, forced recruitment deviates from this trend by having a significant impact on DP. The tactic of forced recruitment is not a manifestation of weakness but rather of a rebel group’s strength and willingness to deter defection and induce compliance (Sawyer and Andrews, 2020). As such, the ability to project authority among the recruits and enforce compliance through coercive means may translate into more resolute behaviour of former rebel groups in the post-agreement phase.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Rebel group legitimacy, ideology and durable peace

Druckman,

Vuković,

Verbeek

2023

IJCMA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose This study aims to explore the role of rebel group legitimacy and ideology in durable peace (DP) following peace agreements to end civil wars. It builds on earlier research showing that justice and civil society involvement are critical in achieving DP. This study adds the impacts of rebel group activities and support on DP. Activities include service delivery and mobilization. Support is gauged with outcomes of presidential and parliamentary elections held following peace agreements. Design/methodology/approach Five data sets were used to measure the key variables: DP, inclusive commissions (IC), legitimacy symmetry (electoral outcomes), service delivery and ideological mobilization. A measure of rebel group integration in the political system was also constructed. Impacts of the integration, legitimacy and ideology variables were assessed with a hierarchical regression model (HRM). This study begins with a base model drawn from earlier research showing the key predictors were procedural justice (PJ) and IC. The authors ask about the extent to which the rebel group variables contribute additional variance to the prediction of DP. Findings The main contributors to the prediction of DP were PJ, IC and integration in the political system. None of the legitimacy or mobilization variables added significant variance to the prediction. Only one of the mobilization variables, forced recruitment, was significant. The decision to integrate into the political system following the agreement did not mediate the relationship between PJ in the negotiation process and DP. Results of a factor analysis showed that DP, PJ, IC and integration formed a cluster with strong loadings on the first factor. Research limitations/implications The negative results for the legitimacy and mobilization variables may not be the last word on rebel group influences. Lack of support for the key hypotheses spurs attempts to discover other sources that contribute to the survival of rebel group actors in the political system and, in turn, to DP. Practical implications The issues raised by this study contribute to debates about ways to attain peaceful relations among competing groups following a civil war. It appears that attention to factors inside and around the negotiation process (PJ, ICs and conversion) may be more important than rebel group activities outside of these processes. The results call attention, in particular, to the important role played by political integration. From a policy perspective, it would be useful to develop levers for encouraging rebel groups to emerge as political actors in the post-agreement environment. Originality/value Developing measures of the symmetry of rebel group legitimacy and integration in the context of a comparative case study are the primary original contributions of this study. Furthermore, the mode of analysis (HRM) is novel in this literature. This approach builds on and extends the earlier research on factors influencing DP.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, it may also be the case that these appeals are insufficient to attract the hoped-for support. If so, rebel groups may rely on more assertive and forceful practices of recruitment (Eck, 2014; Sawyer and Andrews, 2020).…”

Section: Ideological Appeals and Durable Peacementioning

confidence: 99%