2020
DOI: 10.1080/09592318.2020.1757916
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rebel governance, rebel legitimacy, and external intervention: assessing three phases of Taliban rule in Afghanistan

Abstract: This article focuses on rebel governance and rebel legitimacy during civil war. It investigates how external intervention in support of an incumbent government and withdrawal of external forces shape rebel legitimacy dynamics and rebels' opportunities to govern. It adopts a longitudinal perspective on Afghanistan's Taliban, analyzing three phases of the movement's existence. Moral forms of legitimacy resonated particularly during instances of external intervention, whereas pragmatic forms of legitimacy became … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Scholarly accounts are replete with descriptions of how collaboration is the lifeblood of any armed campaign to control territory (e.g., Kalyvas 2006;Petersen 2001). 6 Throughout history and around the world, armed groups such as the Revolutionary Armed Forces (FARC) in Colombia (Arjona 2016), the Taliban in Afghanistan (Terpstra 2020), the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) in Sri Lanka (Mampilly 2011), the Bakonozos of Northern Uganda (Kasfir 2005), and the Nazis in occupied territories during the Second World War (Wistrich 2013) have relied heavily on a range of collaborators to capture and hold territory. The spectrum of collaboration in these cases ranged from horrific acts-such as murder, kidnapping, torture, rape, and even genocide-to much less severe transgressions that did not involve violence; civilian collaborators in these cases performed a wide range of nonmilitary functions and services, including tax collection, sanitation, healthcare, education, and supplying or otherwise supporting combatants.…”
Section: Case Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholarly accounts are replete with descriptions of how collaboration is the lifeblood of any armed campaign to control territory (e.g., Kalyvas 2006;Petersen 2001). 6 Throughout history and around the world, armed groups such as the Revolutionary Armed Forces (FARC) in Colombia (Arjona 2016), the Taliban in Afghanistan (Terpstra 2020), the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) in Sri Lanka (Mampilly 2011), the Bakonozos of Northern Uganda (Kasfir 2005), and the Nazis in occupied territories during the Second World War (Wistrich 2013) have relied heavily on a range of collaborators to capture and hold territory. The spectrum of collaboration in these cases ranged from horrific acts-such as murder, kidnapping, torture, rape, and even genocide-to much less severe transgressions that did not involve violence; civilian collaborators in these cases performed a wide range of nonmilitary functions and services, including tax collection, sanitation, healthcare, education, and supplying or otherwise supporting combatants.…”
Section: Case Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rebel groups may have some amount of legitimacy among a certain constituency despite not having legal standing or international recognition. Even external legitimacy, or how a rebel organization is seen and handled in the international arena, is crucial, especially for separatist movements (Terpstra, 2020). The Taliban's backing for terrorist organizations, notably Al-Qaeda, continues to worry Western observers, posing a regional and international security danger but the Taliban agreed that no terrorist organization would be allowed to use it.…”
Section: The Recognition Of Talibanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1996, the trend of international publications regarding the Taliban indicated a steady increase since the Taliban took over the power of the Afghan government and regulated all activities of the Afghan people under strict Islamic sharia law, considered a radical regime. 17 Upon overtaking control of the Afghan government, the Taliban was overthrown by the United States intervention in 2001 after the 9/11 events. Such an event attracted international attention because of the 9/11 bombings by the Al-Qaeda group, which was suspected of having ties to the Taliban group.…”
Section: International Publication Trends About the Talibanmentioning
confidence: 99%