2011
DOI: 10.3386/w16686
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rebalancing and the Chinese VAT: Some Numerical Simulation Results

Abstract: for discussions. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peerreviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We then use a particular functional form that allows some countries to be savers and others borrowers, and in the Armington trade structure this allows for endogenous determination of trade imbalances. This structure differs from an alternation endogenous trade imbalance simulation for China recently used by Li and Whalley (2011), which does not fit for the US and Germany. We calibrate this model to 2010 data on consumption, production, and trade, involving goods in each country and use immobile capital and labor as factor inputs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…We then use a particular functional form that allows some countries to be savers and others borrowers, and in the Armington trade structure this allows for endogenous determination of trade imbalances. This structure differs from an alternation endogenous trade imbalance simulation for China recently used by Li and Whalley (2011), which does not fit for the US and Germany. We calibrate this model to 2010 data on consumption, production, and trade, involving goods in each country and use immobile capital and labor as factor inputs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%